1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112081003261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffeting forces on rigid circular cylinders in cross flows

Abstract: Experimentally measured steady and unsteady forces induced by a cross flow over a smooth circular cylinder are reported in this paper. The measurements were made in the 0·305 m research water tunnel of the Pennsylvania State University. The parameters examined include the Reynolds number, which was varied over a range of 2 × 104 to 2 × 106, free-stream turbulent intensity, integral length scale-to-diameter ratio and active span-to-diameter ratio; however, this paper includes only some of these results.Among th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(25 reference statements)
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the results match the measurements by So and Savkar [6], Schewe [7], Cheung and Melbourne [8], and Mulcahy [5].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the results match the measurements by So and Savkar [6], Schewe [7], Cheung and Melbourne [8], and Mulcahy [5].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…6 appear to be lower than those by some other measurements [6]. This is attributed to the relatively large length-to-diameter ratio of the tube.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Most of the studies about fluctuations during the drag crisis focus on the global Kármán mode 5,14 , and especially the measurement of the Strouhal frequency. Consequently, the dynamics of the transitions between the one bubble and two bubbles states is less studied than the weakening of the shedding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a pre-load to measured load ratio of larger than six, reasonably accurate force measurements may be obtained (So and Savkar, 1981). The present pre-load of the load cell was 25 kN, about 4.1 Â 10 3 times the maximum forces measured (6 N), resulting in a very high signal-to-noise ratio in the measurement of fluid forces.…”
Section: Force Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 87%