1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1990.tb00225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Budgeting for Public Capital

Abstract: City governments provide much of the economic and social capital comprising urban infrastructure. A prevailing idea is that public managers should and can budget rationally and systematically for the provision of infrastructure. This view frequently neglects consideration of the reactive, ad hoc nature of infrastructure investment in cities. Common approaches to the notion of rational capital budgeting are discussed and a reinterpretation of how city governments supply infrastructure is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, previous literature on infrastructure investment in the field of public affairs can be classified into two groups. One group deals with early studies that are about the normative approach of how to manage or improve capital assets [2][3][4]. For example, Millar [3] criticized that prior literature on capital budgeting is not useful for local governments to set capital project priorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, previous literature on infrastructure investment in the field of public affairs can be classified into two groups. One group deals with early studies that are about the normative approach of how to manage or improve capital assets [2][3][4]. For example, Millar [3] criticized that prior literature on capital budgeting is not useful for local governments to set capital project priorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%