2016
DOI: 10.1101/040675
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BuddySuite: Command-line toolkits for manipulating sequences, alignments, and phylogenetic trees

Abstract: The ability to manipulate sequence, alignment, and phylogenetic tree files has become an increasingly important skill in the life sciences, whether to generate summary information or to prepare data for further downstream analysis. The command line can be an extremely powerful environment for interacting with these resources, but only if the user has the appropriate general-purpose tools on hand. BuddySuite is a collection of four independent yet interrelated command-line toolkits that facilitate each step in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple sequence alignments were predicted with Clustal Omega (56) and maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred against the LG-gamma model using PhyML (57). Alignments and phylogenies were performed using Align-Buddy and PhyloBuddy, respectively (55). Time course RNA-Seq data published in Ref.…”
Section: Bioinformatics In Silico Sequence Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple sequence alignments were predicted with Clustal Omega (56) and maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred against the LG-gamma model using PhyML (57). Alignments and phylogenies were performed using Align-Buddy and PhyloBuddy, respectively (55). Time course RNA-Seq data published in Ref.…”
Section: Bioinformatics In Silico Sequence Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting alignments frequently contained indel‐rich stretches of poorly aligned non‐exonic sequences which were several thousand base pairs long. We used BuddySuite v1.3.0 (Bond et al, 2017) to reduce the number of these regions by trimming alignment positions that consisted of more than 50% gaps. Any alignments that were missing more than 20% of the samples or the S. hirsuta sample were also excluded from further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%