2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.05.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling of moderately thick arbitrarily shaped plates with intermediate point supports using a simple hp-cloud method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current analytical solutions for the buckling phenomenon in rectangular plates are primarily restricted to scenarios featuring uncomplicated boundary conditions with two opposite sides simply supported, commonly referred to as Lévy type plates. As for rectangular plates with non-opposite side simple supported, most research has relied on similar/numerical methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For rectangular plates under corner support conditions, finite difference method [13], differential quadrature method [14,15], discrete singular convolution method [16,17], meshless method [18], generalized Galerkin method [19,20], etc., have been used to obtain the similar/numerical solution of the buckling problem of such plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current analytical solutions for the buckling phenomenon in rectangular plates are primarily restricted to scenarios featuring uncomplicated boundary conditions with two opposite sides simply supported, commonly referred to as Lévy type plates. As for rectangular plates with non-opposite side simple supported, most research has relied on similar/numerical methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For rectangular plates under corner support conditions, finite difference method [13], differential quadrature method [14,15], discrete singular convolution method [16,17], meshless method [18], generalized Galerkin method [19,20], etc., have been used to obtain the similar/numerical solution of the buckling problem of such plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of the meshless methods with different approximation methods and discretization schemes have been proposed and demonstrated during the past decades. Among them, the mature meshless methods include the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (Liu et al, 2019), element-free Galerkin method (Li and Dong, 2019), hp-cloud approach (Jafari and Azhari, 2017), reproducing kernel particle approach (Wang and Li, 2020), natural element approach (Somireddy and Rajagopal, 2015), local Petrov-Galerkin method (Abbaszadeh and Dehghan, 2020), finite point approach (Shojaei et al, 2017), element-free manifold approach (Gao and Wei, 2017), radial point interpolation approach (Zhou et al, 2020c), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some significant contributions to the research on plate stability are reported by: Gambhir [2], Bulson [3], Chajes [4], Timoshenko and Gere [5], Shi [8], Shi and Bezine [9], Ullah et al [10,11,12,13], Wang et al [14], Abodi [15], Yu [16], Abolghasemi et al [17], Xiang et al [18] and Bouazza et al [19] Contemporary research work on the plate stability problems have used various numerical methods such as the differential quadrature method (DQM), discrete singular convolution (DSC) method, harmonic differential quadrature method, ordinary finite difference method (FDM), meshfree method, generalized Galerkin method, finite strip method, B-spline finite strip method, exact finite strip method, hp-cloud method, modified Ishlinskii's solution method, meshless analog equation method, finite element method (FEM), extended Kantorovich method (EKM) and pb2-Ritz method. Very recent research work on the subject of plate stability using various numerical and analytical techniques have been reported by Lopatin and Morozov [20], Ghannadpour et al [21], Jafari and Azhari [22], Zureick [23], Seifi et al [24], Li et al [25], Wang et al [26], Mandal and Mishra [27], Shama [28], and Yao and Fujikubo [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%