“…A non-negligible advantage of the general meth-od with respect to the other two alternatives consists in the fact that only FE numerical analyses and/or analytical computations are required, avoiding hence stub column and beam tests. Despite very refined FE beam formulations that are nowadays available to model cold-formed thin walled members [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], the buckling analysis of the perforated beam-columns can be carried out via commercial (and economical) finite element analysis programs to model the uprights by means of elastic shell elements: in this way the influence of the perforation sys-tems reflects directly on the critical load multiplier α cr,op . Moreover, also the term α ult,k , which is related to the attainment of the yielding of the most stressed point of the net crosssection under axial load and bending moment, can be estimated directly.…”