2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble Formation in the Electrolyte Triggers Voltage Instability in CO2 Electrolyzers

Abstract: The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 is promising for mitigating anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions; however, voltage instabilities currently inhibit reaching high current densities that are prerequisite for commercialization. Here, for the first time, we elucidate that product gaseous bubble accumulation on the electrode/electrolyte interface is the direct cause of the voltage instability in CO 2 electrolyzers. Although bubble formation in water electrolyzers has been extensively studied, we identified t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, FE CO in ChI remained lower than ChCl and ChBr. The subtle difference in FE CO between ChBr and ChCl could be due to uncertainty in the results attributed to various factors such as catalyst deposition on the GDE, [17] cations/anions in the catholyte, [17,67] hydrodynamic layer, [67] and the presence of gas bubbles [68–70] . The FE CO results observed in the flow‐cell (beyond 10 mA cm −2 ) are inconsistent with the H‐type cell results at more negative potentials (beyond −1.0 V vs. RHE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, FE CO in ChI remained lower than ChCl and ChBr. The subtle difference in FE CO between ChBr and ChCl could be due to uncertainty in the results attributed to various factors such as catalyst deposition on the GDE, [17] cations/anions in the catholyte, [17,67] hydrodynamic layer, [67] and the presence of gas bubbles [68–70] . The FE CO results observed in the flow‐cell (beyond 10 mA cm −2 ) are inconsistent with the H‐type cell results at more negative potentials (beyond −1.0 V vs. RHE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, under this circumstance, it is prone to show product crossow via the GDL due to the pressure difference and CO 2 bubbles in the catholyte leads to a uctuation in the cell voltage upon time. 43 In this conguration, extensive studies have been proven to be efficient over conventional H-type cells. For example, Bi 2 O 3 nanotube catalyst showed 100% selectivity at À1.05 V vs. RHE, a high current density (60 mA cm geo À2 ), and a long-term catalytic stability >48 h in 0.5 M KHCO 3 under a standard H-type cell.…”
Section: Gas Diffusion Electrode (Gde)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as these mixed-dimensional vdW heterostructures have more surface-active sites, CO 2 bubble formation becomes an important issue. Bubble formation, particularly at high applied potentials, may block active sites causing voltage instabilities that accelerate the degradation rate of the catalysts ( Lee et al., 2020 ; Ren et al., 2020 ; Xing et al., 2021 ). To date, there have been no mechanistic studies on how CO 2 bubble formation affects the current/voltage response of catalytic systems in terms of nucleation rate, lifetime, and internal pressure of the bubbles, especially for vdW heterostructures, nor has there been an overall study of degradation mechanisms for catalysts under large applied potentials or surrounded by high-energy excitons.…”
Section: Mixed Dimensional and Hierarchical Photocatalysis For Co 2 Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%