2001
DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method

Abstract: For nearly a decade microbiologists have used the MIC breakpoints published in the BSAC Guide to Susceptibility Testing to interpret susceptibility. Historically, and unlike the rest of Europe, the UK and Ireland have used a comparative method of disc testing to interpret susceptibility rather than one based on a correlation between MIC and zone of inhibition. Although innovative when introduced in the 1970s, Stokes' comparative method has evolved ad hoc and it has become increasingly apparent that there is a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined for ciprofloxacin (1 g), cephalothin (30 g), ampicillin (10 g), kanamycin (10 g), tetracycline (10 g), gentamicin (10 g), and trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (25 g). Disc diffusion assays were performed according to the standardized British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (38). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined for ciprofloxacin (1 g), cephalothin (30 g), ampicillin (10 g), kanamycin (10 g), tetracycline (10 g), gentamicin (10 g), and trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (25 g). Disc diffusion assays were performed according to the standardized British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (38). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial activity was tested by the disc diffusion technique [17]. Different concentrations of the extract were prepared by reconstituting the stock with distilled water.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activity Test and Determination Of Minimum Inhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the test, cell suspensions were carefully washed three times with 0.86 % sterile saline solution. Bacterial resistance was assessed by the disc diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) method (Andrews, 2008) and the Biolog GEN III MicroPlate (the chemicals and their concentrations are listed in Table S3). The major respiratory quinones were extracted and analysed by HPLC fitted with a reversed-phase column as described by Komagata & Suzuki (1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%