2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bryophytes in a changing landscape: The hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
77
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
77
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the alarming rate of habitat destruction at a global scale, there is an urgent need to understand how species persist in highly dynamic habitats from both spatial and temporal perspectives (Stewart et al 2000;Hanski 2005;Pharo & Zartman 2007). Theoretical and empirical animals and plant studies have tried to elucidate how organisms use spatially distributed resources, and the consequences of resource distribution for population-level processes (Tilman & Kareiva 1997;Lancaster & Downes 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the alarming rate of habitat destruction at a global scale, there is an urgent need to understand how species persist in highly dynamic habitats from both spatial and temporal perspectives (Stewart et al 2000;Hanski 2005;Pharo & Zartman 2007). Theoretical and empirical animals and plant studies have tried to elucidate how organisms use spatially distributed resources, and the consequences of resource distribution for population-level processes (Tilman & Kareiva 1997;Lancaster & Downes 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, distance-dependent dispersal cannot be ignored (Walser 2004;Óckinger et al 2005;Pharo & Zartman 2007;Johansson 2008). A growing body of literature is devoted to assess the influence of the nearest tree distance on the dynamics of epiphytic populations (e.g., Gu et al 2001;Kalwij et al 2005;Snail et al 2005;Bolli et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of floristic seedling composition and mortality suggest substantial influence of increased desiccation stress on IT seedling assemblages, which may greatly exceed the influence of dispersal constraints (compare Snäll et al 2003). Disentangling the roles of these diversity drivers in complex anthropogenic landscapes poses methodological difficulties that may have led to an overestimation of the role of dispersal limitation in epiphytes (Pharo and Zartman 2007;Werth et al 2007). Given that establishment constraints are a key for the prediction of future epiphyte communities, further studies on this matter will yield critical new insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lack of bryophyte mats; Krömer and Gradstein 2003). The importance of dispersal constraints has been emphasised particularly in the ample literature on non-vascular epiphytes (Pharo and Zartman 2007). Where epiphyte assemblages survive initial disturbance, such as in moderately logged forest, forest fragments or on remnant trees, impoverishment should proceed gradually due to lowered survival of well-established plants or reduced establishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on bryophytes in urban areas suggests that edge effects caused by forest fragmentation strongly decrease bryophyte diversity (Baldwin & Bradfield, 2007;Oishi, 2009;Pharo & Zartman, 2007); habitat heterogeneity, on the other hand, increases bryophyte diversity (Cole, Newmaster, Bell, Pitt, & Stinson, 2008;Gignac & Dale, 2005;Pharo & Zartman, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%