2003
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0491.00213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brussels between Bern and Berlin: Comparative Federalism Meets the European Union

Abstract: In the current debate on the future European order, the European Union (EU) is often described as an "emerging federation." This article claims that federalism is not exclusively useful in deliberating about the future of the EU. Non-statecentric conceptions of federalism provide a better understanding of the current structure and functioning of the European system of multilevel governance than most theories of European integration and international relations do. We combine political and economic perspectives … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without such cooperative devices, regions and the central government would not be able to cope with over-complexity, conflicting operating logics and excessive transaction costs which result from ambiguous and incomplete constitutions. In addition, the dual and competitive nature of the Belgian polity contrasts with the cooperative nature of the European system of governance where competences are shared rather than divided (Hix 1998;Bo¨rzel and Risse 2000;Bo¨rzel and Hosli 2003;Bo¨rzel 2005).…”
Section: The Europeanisation Of Federal Institutional Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without such cooperative devices, regions and the central government would not be able to cope with over-complexity, conflicting operating logics and excessive transaction costs which result from ambiguous and incomplete constitutions. In addition, the dual and competitive nature of the Belgian polity contrasts with the cooperative nature of the European system of governance where competences are shared rather than divided (Hix 1998;Bo¨rzel and Risse 2000;Bo¨rzel and Hosli 2003;Bo¨rzel 2005).…”
Section: The Europeanisation Of Federal Institutional Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A (possible) hierarchical intervention by (external) state actors is ascribed a privileged function, because it can induce and backup non-hierarchical modes of coordination constituting a shadow of (external) hierarchy. The modes of coordination are determined by an institutional structure, which can be hardly changed by the governance actors (Börzel 2010;Mayntz 2005).…”
Section: Issue and Central Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it soon turned out to be unrealistic to create a supranational federal state given the interests of member state governments to maintain their powers, federalism remained an important normative concept in political discussions and research (Bogdandy 1999;Nicolaïdis and Howse 2002). Recently, scholars have proposed using it as a descriptive concept as well, in order to carve out the features of the EU polity in comparison with existing federations, in particular with the U.S. and Switzerland (Börzel and Hosli 2003;Cappelletti, Seccombe, and Weiler 1986;Fabbrini 2005;McKay 2001;Menon and Schain 2006;Sbragia 1992;Trechsel 2005), but sometimes also -and not always convincinglywith other federal states (e.g. Heinemann-Grüder 2002).…”
Section: Normative Theories: Criteria For Competence Allocation Betwementioning
confidence: 99%