2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40364-021-00349-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brush swab as a noninvasive surrogate for tissue biopsies in epigenomic profiling of oral cancer

Abstract: Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has poor survival rates. There is a pressing need to develop more precise risk assessment methods to tailor clinical treatment. Epigenome-wide association studies in OSCC have not produced a viable biomarker. These studies have relied on methylation array platforms, which are limited in their ability to profile the methylome. In this study, we use MethylCap-Seq (MC-Seq), a comprehensive methylation quantification technique, and brush swab samples, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study examining epigenome-wide DNA methylation compared sample acquisition by biopsy and isohelix brush swab for cancers in the oral cavity found no significant difference in DNA yield between tissue and brush samples and matched tissue. Isohelix brush swabs had an excellent correlation in the oral cavity 10 . In this prior study, mapping efficacy was over 90% for swab-acquired DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study examining epigenome-wide DNA methylation compared sample acquisition by biopsy and isohelix brush swab for cancers in the oral cavity found no significant difference in DNA yield between tissue and brush samples and matched tissue. Isohelix brush swabs had an excellent correlation in the oral cavity 10 . In this prior study, mapping efficacy was over 90% for swab-acquired DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this prior study, mapping efficacy was over 90% for swab-acquired DNA. Investigators successfully identified potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers for malignant lesions in the oral cavity with high sensitivity and specificity using a comparable isohelix swab design as was used here 10 . While isohelix brushes have been designed and marketed for DNA acquisition of the buccal mucosa, we were able to acquire sufficient quality and quantity DNA for WES in all but one tumor sample with collected samples by isohelix brushings from cervical mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional study comparing sample acquisition by biopsy and isohelix brush swab for cancers in the oral cavity for epigenome-wide DNA methylation found no significant difference in DNA yield between tissue and brush samples and matched tissue. Isohelix brush swabs had an excellent correlation in the oral cavity [ 10 ]. Mean DNA yield from frozen tissue was 0.39ug (range 0.19–0.66ug), and 0.53ug (range 0.51–2.00ug) from swab-acquired DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, cervical tumors are an ideal setting for the serial study of treatment response because tumors can be readily monitored by physical exam and are accessible for sampling through the course of chemoradiotherapy. Encouragingly, successful non-invasive swab-based sample acquisition of DNA has been demonstrated in the screening and diagnosis of precancerous and cancerous lesions in the oral cavity and detection of HPV-associated cutaneous lesions by PCR [ 10 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%