2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronchial carcinoid tumors: nodal status and long-term survival after resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
147
7
17

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
147
7
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Beasley et al found that increased numbers of mitoses, tumor size >3.5 cm, and female gender were negative predictors of survival, whereas smoking was not (3). The same is found in several other studies regarding smoking (12,13). In the present study, survival was associated with gender, Ki67-index, and metastatic disease at diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beasley et al found that increased numbers of mitoses, tumor size >3.5 cm, and female gender were negative predictors of survival, whereas smoking was not (3). The same is found in several other studies regarding smoking (12,13). In the present study, survival was associated with gender, Ki67-index, and metastatic disease at diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Patients had a similar distribution of age, gender, and tumor type compared with previous studies. (4,8,9,13,20). Hence, they were representative of the population with bronchial carcinoids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, it can been seen that the survivals of patients with LCNEC and SCLC were slightly better. Different from the previous reports (Fink et al, 2001;Ferguson et al, 2002;Filosso et al, 2002;Cardillo et al, 2004), the histological subtype did not provide the accurate prediction of prognosis according to multivariate analysis. The results in this study revealed that age, TNM staging and treatment were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors that conditioned the long-term survival.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Indeed, differentiation of GEP NET classified as poorly compared with well-differentiated (WD) carcinoma (Johnson et al 1986, Greenberg et al 1987, Madeira et al 1998, Travis et al 1998, Rindi et al 1999, Lim et al 2005, Panzuto et al 2005, Asamura et al 2006, Faggiano et al 2007, Lepage et al 2007, Pape et al 2008 and stage (Lo et al 1996, Pelosi et al 1996, Burke et al 1997, Madeira et al 1998, Kirshbom et al 1999, Rindi et al 1999, Shebani et al 1999, Onaitis et al 2000, Quaedvlieg et al 2001, Rigaud et al 2001, Solorzano et al 2001, Hochwald et al 2002, Plöckinger et al 2004, Panzuto et al 2005, Tomassetti et al 2006, Baudin 2007, Pape et al 2008 as long been recognized the strongest prognostic parameters before the primary location. More recently, lymph node metastases (Hellman et al 2002, Cardillo et al 2004, Lim et al 2005, Tomassetti et al 2005, Baudin 2007, García-Yuste et al 2007, Rea et al 2007, Pape et al 2008 and proliferative index have emerged as major determinant of prognosis in GEP tumors of the lung (Travis et al 1998, Beasley ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%