2009
DOI: 10.1677/erc-08-0301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors influencing survival from metastatic (stage IV) gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma

Abstract: Survival of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (GEP WDEC) is not well characterized. We evaluated the long-term outcome and prognostic factors for survival in 118 patients with distant metastases from GEP WDEC. Inclusion criteria were 1) pathological review by a single pathologist according to the present WHO criteria, 2) absence of previous therapy apart from surgery, 3) complete morphological evaluation within 3 months including somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
72
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the absence of midgut primaries and male predominance do not mirror classic metastatic low-grade well-differentiated GEP neoplasms in which ileum is the most frequent primary location and sex ratio is around one. This point is even better illustrated by the median OS of our patients, which is higher than the 8-month median OS usually observed in metastatic poorly differentiated NEC (Moertel et al 1991, Mitry et al 1999, Yamazaki et al 2005, Hainsworth et al 2006 but is still lower than expected for metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NEN, for which the 5-year survival is about 50% (Durante et al 2009.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…For instance, the absence of midgut primaries and male predominance do not mirror classic metastatic low-grade well-differentiated GEP neoplasms in which ileum is the most frequent primary location and sex ratio is around one. This point is even better illustrated by the median OS of our patients, which is higher than the 8-month median OS usually observed in metastatic poorly differentiated NEC (Moertel et al 1991, Mitry et al 1999, Yamazaki et al 2005, Hainsworth et al 2006 but is still lower than expected for metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NEN, for which the 5-year survival is about 50% (Durante et al 2009.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…However, because of the general lack of available prospective studies, potential predictors of outcome for patients with NET have been predominantly analyzed by use of retrospective data (16,35,36,38,(41)(42)(43)(44). The advantage of the present study is that our cohort of patients underwent the same treatment modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumors were classified according to the 2010 WHO classification and the ENETS grading system (Rindi et al 2006). TEMbased regimens were proposed regardless of previous therapeutic line in case of progression of metastases according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines on two consecutive imaging procedures performed at 6-month intervals and/or when liver burden was >50% (Skinazi et al 1996, Durante et al 2009, Pavel et al 2012. Patients received TEM alone or in combination with capecitabine.…”
Section: Patients and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%