2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0035710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadly tuned face representation in older adults assessed by categorical perception.

Abstract: Studies of face recognition in older adults (60 years of age and older) report increases in false alarms over younger adults (usually 18-30 years of age), but no age differences in hits. To examine this phenomenon, we compared older and younger adults in categorical perception of faces. We hypothesized that face representations in older adults would be broadly tuned, resulting in overlapping representations, manifested by a shallower slope in identity categorization than in younger adults, and age-related redu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous CP studies using morphed faces 7,24 2.67, SE = . 19) did not reach significance, 95% CI [-.05, .89], two-tailed t-test, t(34) = 1.83, p = .076, although it did represent a medium-sized effect 25 , r = .…”
Section: Notesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In accordance with previous CP studies using morphed faces 7,24 2.67, SE = . 19) did not reach significance, 95% CI [-.05, .89], two-tailed t-test, t(34) = 1.83, p = .076, although it did represent a medium-sized effect 25 , r = .…”
Section: Notesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It may also be suggested that having more life experience may cause older adults to view the sample of faces used in this study as overall less distinctive with respect to the features of all possible faces. However, due to the lack of consistency of older adults also in their ratings of the perceptual qualities of the faces (distinctiveness and familiarity) it may be suggested that the lower inter-rater scores of older adults may be linked to either the lack of differentiation between the representations of the face stimuli (Lee et al, 2014) or to the internal representations of each of the faces on preference-relevant dimensions to be noisy or overlapping. Both of these effects could possibly lead to changes in judgments of repeated stimuli resulting in low inter-rater correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows us to calculate the probability that a rater will assign two randomly chosen faces to different levels on a rating scale, which is an indication of the level of age-related neural differentiation of the face stimuli (i.e., the cognitive processes become less distinct in older adulthood; e.g., Baltes et al, 1980; Salthouse et al, 1996; Lee et al, 2014). The differentiation scores for each rating dimension were calculated using the probability of differentiation ( P D ), where i is the level on the rating scale (1–7), and P is the proportion of ratings at the n th level (for more details see Linville et al, 1986; Ng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample of participants included [-46.34, -42.76]) but not education (t(43) = -1.07, p = .29). This sample size was determined on the basis of prior work on aging and face perception research (Lee et al, 2014;Norton et al, 2009). All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and no history of neurological or visual disorders.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%