2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces

Abstract: Although aesthetic preferences are known to be important in person perception and can play a significant role in everyday social decisions, the effect of the age of the observer on aesthetic preferences for faces of different ages has not yet been fully investigated. In the present study we investigated whether aesthetic preferences change with aging, with an age-related bias in favoring faces from one’s own age group. In addition, we examined the role of age on both the perceptual qualities and the social att… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results corroborate evidence that younger faces appear more trustworthy than older faces [33] and that perceived vocal babyishness positively predicts ratings of warmth, honesty, and kindness [41]. Additionally, they converge with a more general age bias and a "youth ideal" that appeals on multiple levels and that readily engages processing resources.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results corroborate evidence that younger faces appear more trustworthy than older faces [33] and that perceived vocal babyishness positively predicts ratings of warmth, honesty, and kindness [41]. Additionally, they converge with a more general age bias and a "youth ideal" that appeals on multiple levels and that readily engages processing resources.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the context of a trust game, participants expressed greater trust towards older as compared with younger individuals [31], yet their trustworthiness ratings did not map onto actual behavior in the game. Moreover, other work assessing trustworthiness impressions found them to be independent of age [32] or to favour younger over older adults [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This interpretation is used to explain not only the positive psychological condition but also the physical one in which the recipient was described with positive physical features, such as "he/she dresses in a serious fashion" (see Table 1). Moreover, previous studies found that older adults were positively biased by the first impression received from the unfamiliar faces, giving higher ratings of positive perceptual and social attributes compared to younger adults (Kiiski et al, 2016;Zebrowitz et al, 2013). However, in the light of the age-related increase in altruistic motivation (Hubbard et al, 2016) and in the prioritization of socially meaningful goals (Carstensen et al, 2003), our results support the view that older adults give more relevance to social reward than monetary reward (e.g., Redemacher et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two high-resolution images of young, female faces with a neutral facial expression from the FACES database (Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin;image ID 132, 182;Ebner, Riediger, & Lindenberger, 2010) served as CS. The images presented resembled each other regarding relevant perceptual and social parameters comprising perceived attractiveness, competence, dominance, familiarity, trustworthiness, and distinctiveness, based on empirical ratings provided in an aesthetic preference study (Kiiski, Cullen, Clavin, & Newell, 2016). Both stimuli had equal mean luminance and were presented on a gray background.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, participants performed a dichotomous preference rating: Both cues and four further images of young female faces from the FACES database (image ID 63, 22, 150, 171) most similar in rated attractiveness were used (Kiiski et al, 2016). During each choice, two stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants were asked to promptly indicate via button press which image they preferred based on their current judgment (Bray & O'Doherty, 2007;Kahnt et al, 2011;Metereau & Dreher, 2013;Prévost et al, 2013).…”
Section: Dichotomous Preference Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%