2010
DOI: 10.1109/mnet.2010.5395779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadcasting safety information in vehicular networks: issues and approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have to note, however, that due to the untrusted nature of the host, it can be the case that it may not forward the revocation message to the TC for further processing. As we will elaborate in Section VI-B, the implementation of a "heartbeat" mechanism (similar to the one used for monitoring the status of one-hop vehicular topologies [29]) can provide protection against such malevolent actions. The RA sends out a message every cycle (which is expected to be received by TCs), either a revocation request or a signed and timestamped heartbeat message.…”
Section: Motivation and Design Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have to note, however, that due to the untrusted nature of the host, it can be the case that it may not forward the revocation message to the TC for further processing. As we will elaborate in Section VI-B, the implementation of a "heartbeat" mechanism (similar to the one used for monitoring the status of one-hop vehicular topologies [29]) can provide protection against such malevolent actions. The RA sends out a message every cycle (which is expected to be received by TCs), either a revocation request or a signed and timestamped heartbeat message.…”
Section: Motivation and Design Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the biggest problems with the existing data aggregation mechanisms that use both segments and areas as an aggregation structure is their dependence on location information obtained from external positioning systems like satellite navigation, GPS or digital maps. These positioning systems are still not widely available in most vehicles [14], and thus would limit the use of the data aggregation mechanisms. Additionally, GPS is often unreliable in urban environments [15] and requires complementing localization techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohapatra et al [5] and Chen [8] provide a summary of message broadcast schemes in VANETs. Such schemes have three objectives: (1) reduce the number of redundant messages; (2) guarantee fast forwarding of emergency messages; and (3) ensure dissemination of the messages is highly reliable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the proposed protocol handles the collision problem well. Based on Equations (6) to (8), emergency messages are rebroadcasted repeatedly in a specific time period in hot spot area to satisfy the reliability criterion in DEEP for different vehicle densities and channel error ratios. Therefore, our protocol achieves the threshold for reliable transmission (i.e., the probability that all vehicles within the transmission range will receive the message at least once is more than P success ).…”
Section: Reliability In the Hot Spot Areamentioning
confidence: 99%