2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband shock noise reduction in turbulent jets by water injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absorption by water droplets is exploited 22 to reduce the sound reflected off the ground by the Space Shuttle when launched, 1 as this can damage instruments, although other effects (such as the entrainment of the liquid into the flow and its evaporation) are also important. [23][24][25] This is because the reduction of the sound source level of the jet (by decreasing jet transfer through momentum transfer between liquid and gaseous phases, and reduction in jet temperature through partial vaporization of the water) 26,27 are probably more important than the acoustic absorption that occurs during transmission. Literature features many poetical and fictional descriptions of how sound is changed in fog, although these perceptions also rely on more effects than are demonstrated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Absorption by water droplets is exploited 22 to reduce the sound reflected off the ground by the Space Shuttle when launched, 1 as this can damage instruments, although other effects (such as the entrainment of the liquid into the flow and its evaporation) are also important. [23][24][25] This is because the reduction of the sound source level of the jet (by decreasing jet transfer through momentum transfer between liquid and gaseous phases, and reduction in jet temperature through partial vaporization of the water) 26,27 are probably more important than the acoustic absorption that occurs during transmission. Literature features many poetical and fictional descriptions of how sound is changed in fog, although these perceptions also rely on more effects than are demonstrated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fact that only a single shock-cell/vortex interaction is considered here indicates that the shock noise intensity obtained by the present formulation is essentially omnidirectional. It is believed that the present investigation would be helpful in our understanding of supersonic jet noise [51,52] and its suppression by active control such as water injection [53][54][55].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out by Kandula [25] that the effect of microjet injection in reducing jet noise was mainly by turbulence modification with no appreciable changes in the mean flowfield (velocity and temperature), and that water injection at relatively high MFR reduced jet noise by reducing the jet mean velocity and temperature. The prediction of turbulent jet mixing noise reduction with water injection [25] was recently extended to broadband shock noise [33]. Also, the spectral attenuation of sound with regard to turbulent jet mixing noise was investigated [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%