2009
DOI: 10.2514/1.43421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of High Mach Number Rocket Jet Noise by Water Injection

Abstract: The present work experimentally investigates suppression of the sound level from an underexpanded jet of Mach number 2.8 by water injection. The jet is produced by a solid rocket motor being static test fired. Water is injected from a radial distance of 5.2 jet diameters, at different axial locations from the exit of the nozzle, at two different angles of injection relative to the downstream jet axis. The ratio of mass flow rates of water to the nozzle exhaust gas (referred to as the mass flow rate ratio) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the mass flow rate ratio between the liquid water and missile exhaust is 2.86, which is in the range of 2–5, as used in Sankaran et al. 34 Since the missile is climbing during launch, the dynamic layering method 5 of the dynamic mesh tool is adopted to simulate the movement. Two stationary boundaries are set for the missile’s movement: one for the compressed mesh and the other for the expanding mesh.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And the mass flow rate ratio between the liquid water and missile exhaust is 2.86, which is in the range of 2–5, as used in Sankaran et al. 34 Since the missile is climbing during launch, the dynamic layering method 5 of the dynamic mesh tool is adopted to simulate the movement. Two stationary boundaries are set for the missile’s movement: one for the compressed mesh and the other for the expanding mesh.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the mass flow rate ratio between the liquid water and missile exhaust is 2.86, which is in the range of 2–5, as used in Sankaran et al. 34…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are indications of similar tests for the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency M-V vehicle [9,10]. Sankaran et al [11] provide a summary of various launch acoustic efforts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several research studies utilize sub-scale models of actual launch vehicle configuration [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], including water injection effects in some cases. Most of these studies used actual scaled down rocket motors to obtain exact launch vehicle exhaust conditions, as an attempt to perfectly simulate the launch vehicle scenario in a smaller scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%