2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2018.00130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadband, Polarization-Insensitive Lensed Edge Couplers for Silicon Photonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grating couplers have some major advantages including compact size, wafer-level testing capability, and flexible coupling position, while there are also some drawbacks such as a relatively low coupling efficiency typically below 3 dB, narrow bandwidth, and high wavelength sensitivity. As for the butt coupling regime, under which the fiber is typically placed at the wafer facet and aligned with the Si waveguides horizontally, edge couplers are commonly applied [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Edge couplers can achieve rather high coupling efficiency, broad bandwidth, and polarization independence, but they also have some limitations including relatively a larger footprint than grating couplers, fixed coupling position, and more strict requirements of the coupling facet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grating couplers have some major advantages including compact size, wafer-level testing capability, and flexible coupling position, while there are also some drawbacks such as a relatively low coupling efficiency typically below 3 dB, narrow bandwidth, and high wavelength sensitivity. As for the butt coupling regime, under which the fiber is typically placed at the wafer facet and aligned with the Si waveguides horizontally, edge couplers are commonly applied [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Edge couplers can achieve rather high coupling efficiency, broad bandwidth, and polarization independence, but they also have some limitations including relatively a larger footprint than grating couplers, fixed coupling position, and more strict requirements of the coupling facet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the challenges posed by minimum fabrication width, a common approach involves introducing materials with lower refractive indices. Edge couplers assisted by silicon oxide (SiO 2 ) [8,9], silicon oxynitride [10,11], and polymer [12,13] tapers have been widely studied. However, the fabrication processes of these devices remain relatively immature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this vertical coupling method also has the disadvantages of low coupling efficiency (loss higher than 3 dB), narrow bandwidth, polarization sensitivity, etc. An edge coupler is typically utilized in the butt-coupling mechanism, in which the optical fiber is typically positioned on the wafer end face, aligned horizontally with the Si waveguide [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Edge couplers have the advantages of higher coupling efficiency, a wider bandwidth, and polarization insensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%