1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.39.9273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brittle fracture in materials with random defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to modeling material fracture, the simplest and one of the most popular forms of interaction is through central force ͑or axial͒ springs. [4][5][6] A more general form of interaction is provided by the Born model, 7 which includes both axial and transverse stiffnesses, although this model in not rotationally invariant. With the introduction of rotational degrees of freedom at the element nodes, bond-bending, 8 granular, and Euler-Bernoulli beam 9,10 models overcome the deficiency of the Born model and allow for a more general interaction between the neighboring sites that, in the limit, relate to a gradient continuum, such as Mindlin-Toupin or Cosserat continua.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to modeling material fracture, the simplest and one of the most popular forms of interaction is through central force ͑or axial͒ springs. [4][5][6] A more general form of interaction is provided by the Born model, 7 which includes both axial and transverse stiffnesses, although this model in not rotationally invariant. With the introduction of rotational degrees of freedom at the element nodes, bond-bending, 8 granular, and Euler-Bernoulli beam 9,10 models overcome the deficiency of the Born model and allow for a more general interaction between the neighboring sites that, in the limit, relate to a gradient continuum, such as Mindlin-Toupin or Cosserat continua.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation state of this lattice is fully identified by the value of the lattice angle a and the point-to-point strain 1, so that the lattice strains e x , e y along the principal directions are obtained by a simple projection. Following other researchers [40,41], we describe the lattice elasticity by means of the Born model. Here, each material point is connected only to its nearest neighbours by two kinds of springs: a longitudinal spring K l and a transverse one K t .…”
Section: Born Lattice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such restriction is not suitable for many materials and it can be overcome by introducing non-central force interactions (shear springs) between particles. Hassold and Srolovitz [16] proposed a method to modify the Poisson's ratio by introducing a harmonic potential for rotation of bonds from their initial orientation. Here bonds denote the connecting elements between particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the discrete units are merely lattice sites (nodes). This type of models can be further classified into lattice spring [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and lattice beam [23][24][25][26] models according to the number of degrees of freedom per node and the mechanical properties of connecting elements. In a lattice three-dimensional cases and 0.33 for two-dimensional cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%