Oxford Handbooks Online 2015
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697731.013.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Britain before the Romans

Abstract: Much of Britain saw significant changes in the later part of the first millennium bc, particularly in the south-east. Widespread but regionally varied changes in settlement organization resulted in the emergence of new types of sites, some of which have been termed oppida. Changes included the reappearance of gold, the adoption of wheel-turned pottery, new styles of clothes fastening, and cremation burial from Late La Tène Gaul. The burial tradition included a small number of richly furnished burials. Imports … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(© Vindolanda Trust) 4 Price 1988, 353;conversely, Kilbride-Jones 1938 suggests that glass bangles first appeared in southern Scotland; the latter has been challenged by Stevenson 1953-55; 5 Creighton 2006;Haselgrove and Moore 2007a;Champion 2016; Wallace 2016; Pitts 2019. The proposition also contributes to a recurring plea from scholars (e.g.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Glass Bangles In Britain: the Traditional Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(© Vindolanda Trust) 4 Price 1988, 353;conversely, Kilbride-Jones 1938 suggests that glass bangles first appeared in southern Scotland; the latter has been challenged by Stevenson 1953-55; 5 Creighton 2006;Haselgrove and Moore 2007a;Champion 2016; Wallace 2016; Pitts 2019. The proposition also contributes to a recurring plea from scholars (e.g.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Glass Bangles In Britain: the Traditional Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite changing interpretations, oppida in Britain have retained their role in understanding this period of dramatic social change (e.g. Cunliffe 2005;Creighton 2006;Haselgrove 2007;Hill 2007;Barrett et al 2012;Champion 2016) and thus can be considered one of the most significant developments of the Late Iron Age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 He further suggests that Canterbury may have been chosen as the civitas centre by the Roman administration 'because the religious centre was a neutral meeting point where different tribal groups came together'. 19 Although the Roman administration and authors of our textual sources grouped the people of Kent together as the 12 For LPRIA changes in the South-Eastfor example, coin minting and use, changing burial behaviour, emerging centres of social focus, and adoption of new material culturesee Champion 2016;Cunliffe 2005, 125-77. For this transformation beyond Kent seen through a range of evidence, see Creighton 2000;2006;Wallace 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 For LPRIA changes in the South-East — for example, coin minting and use, changing burial behaviour, emerging centres of social focus, and adoption of new material culture — see Champion 2016; Cunliffe 2005, 125–77. For this transformation beyond Kent seen through a range of evidence, see Creighton 2000; 2006; Wallace 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%