2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing reality to the classroom: Exercises in intertextuality

Abstract: The ability to handle intertextual relations in email is an important component of workplace writing competence that is, for the most part, overlooked in business English classes because of a tendency to treat emails in classroom contexts as independent texts. This study reports on a series of email assignments that required students to read and process a collection of texts before composing emails themselves, with the aim of examining how students dealt with the demands made by the intertextual nature of work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While studies like those of Darics and Gatti (2019) and Gimenez (2014) have looked at the underlying skills that are needed in successfully engaging with digital communication in general, others have looked specifically at the nature of email messages. Over the course of the last two decades, for instance, several studies within the ESP discipline have focussed on the business email (Nickerson, 2000; Bremner and Costley, 2018; Cheng and Mok, 2008; Gains, 1999; Louhiala-Salminen, 2002; Warren, 2013). These have established, for instance, that writers routinely use specialized lexical items to collaborate with each other in intra-corporate email (Nickerson, 2000), that email is a hybrid genre that combines the characteristics of spoken and written discourse in multinational business, often in a network of multilingual transactions (Louhiala-Salminen, 2002), and that intertextual networks always exist between different emails as well as between emails and other business genres that are relied on by writers and receivers to interpret the meaning of the interaction (Cheng and Mok, 2008; Warren, 2013).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While studies like those of Darics and Gatti (2019) and Gimenez (2014) have looked at the underlying skills that are needed in successfully engaging with digital communication in general, others have looked specifically at the nature of email messages. Over the course of the last two decades, for instance, several studies within the ESP discipline have focussed on the business email (Nickerson, 2000; Bremner and Costley, 2018; Cheng and Mok, 2008; Gains, 1999; Louhiala-Salminen, 2002; Warren, 2013). These have established, for instance, that writers routinely use specialized lexical items to collaborate with each other in intra-corporate email (Nickerson, 2000), that email is a hybrid genre that combines the characteristics of spoken and written discourse in multinational business, often in a network of multilingual transactions (Louhiala-Salminen, 2002), and that intertextual networks always exist between different emails as well as between emails and other business genres that are relied on by writers and receivers to interpret the meaning of the interaction (Cheng and Mok, 2008; Warren, 2013).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a later review of the same coursebooks when he looked at activities focussing on collaboration Bremner (2010), found that ‘collaboration is discussed only in the most general terms’ and ‘few tasks provide students with activity-types that would help them understand and experience the kinds of collaborative interaction that they will encounter at work’ (2010: 121). Finally, most recently, Bremner and Costley (2018) show how difficult it can be for learners to understand the significance of intertextuality in email communication, and in particular the contribution that intertextuality can make to the writer-reader relationship. In other words, there is an apparent mismatch between the types of activities that textbooks suggest should be used in the classroom to practice writing, and the writing activities (and skills) that learners will actually need to accomplish once they enter the business arena.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations