Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics &Amp; Knowledge - LAK '16 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2883851.2883916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing order to chaos in MOOC discussion forums with content-related thread identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such keywords as "difference between" have been characterised by Daems et al [6] as "signal concepts". Our overall distinction between types of indicators for certain categories of contributions has also been inspired by Wise and Cui's findings on the identification of forum threads related to the course content using indicator phrases [28]. Additionally, we also identify resource related keywords mentioning course material, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such keywords as "difference between" have been characterised by Daems et al [6] as "signal concepts". Our overall distinction between types of indicators for certain categories of contributions has also been inspired by Wise and Cui's findings on the identification of forum threads related to the course content using indicator phrases [28]. Additionally, we also identify resource related keywords mentioning course material, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The types and themes of discussion forums can be very diverse and are not necessarily related to the actual course subject [20], for example, non-course subject related discussions like search for learning groups or personal introductions, technical and organisational support. Since collaborative knowledge building and information exchange is of great interest Wise and Cui [28] proposed content-based indicators for subject related discussions. Similarly, Rossi et al [23] build supervised classifiers to predict the type of discussion of forum threads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research in predicting drop-out using features hand-engineered from the clickstream have used SVMs [6], logistic regression [7], Hidden Markov Models [8], ensembles of other machine learning methods [9], and recurrent neural networks (RNN) applied to hand engineered features [5]. Other work has included information outside the clickstream, such as forum post data analyzed with natural language processing [10,17]. Frameworks for evaluating various models and their feature sets have also been introduced [15,22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial step in the analysis of forum discussions in online courses is the identification of the discussion threads relevant for course-related information exchange between participants. In a recent study (Wise, Cui, & Vytasek, 2016), a combination of content analysis and machine learning was used to distinguish forum threads in which participants discuss the course content from those merely socializing or discussing organizational matters. Content analysis is also used to characterize forum users based on the types of contributions they make (Arguello & Shaffer, 2015;Liu, Kidzinski, & Dillenbourg, 2015).…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%