Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Landscapes generate a wide range of valuable ecosystem services, yet land use decisions often ignore the value of these services. Using the example of the UK, we show the significance of land use change not only for agricultural production but also for emissions and sequestration of greenhouse gases, open-access recreational visits, urban green space and wild species diversity. We use spatially explicit models in conjunction with valuation methods to estimate comparable economic values for these services, taking account of climate change impacts. We show that, while decisions which focus solely upon agriculture reduce overall ecosystem service values, highly significant value increases can be obtained from targeted planning incorporating all potential services and their values, and that this approach also conserves wild species diversity.One Sentence Summary: Valuation of ecosystem services within land-use planning creates significant gains relative to current, market-dominated, decision making. Main Text:The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (1) provided important evidence of the ongoing global degradation of ecosystem services and highlighted the need to incorporate their value into the economic analyses which underpin real-world decision-making. Previous studies have shown that the overall values of unconverted natural habitats can exceed the private benefits following conversion (2, 3), that knowledge of landscape heterogeneity and ecological processes can support cost effective land planning (4-7), that trade-offs in land-use decisions affect values from ecosystem services and biodiversity at local level (8, 9), and that current land use is vulnerable to the impacts of global change (10, 11). In the UK National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA) (12), a comprehensive assessment of the UK's ecosystems was linked to a systematic, environmental and economic analysis of the benefits they generate. Here we show how taking account of multiple objectives in a changing environment (including, but not restricted to, climate change) fundamentally alters decisions regarding optimal land use. The NEA analyses are based upon highly detailed, spatially-referenced environmental data covering all of Great Britain. These data supported the design and parameterization of models of both the drivers and consequences of land use decisions, incorporating the complexity of the natural environment and its variation across space and time (13). Model outputs provide inputs to economic analyses which assess the value of both marketed and non-marketed goods (Table 1).The NEA specifically addressed the consequences of land use change driven by either just agricultural or a wider set of values, all within the context of ongoing climate change. To assess this, raw data on land use and its determinants were drawn from multiple sources to compile a 40 year dataset, spatially disaggregated at a resolution of 2km grid squares (400ha) or finer across all of Great Britain, forming more than ½ million sets of spatially referenced, time specific...

Potential impact of land use change on ecosystem services in China

“…Studies of this category have usually been carried out from the perspective of land use change and its effect on ecosystem services. Many researchers have investigated the ESVs of different ecosystems (TEEB 2010;Bateman et al 2013). Costanza first classified the biosphere into 16 ecosystems and evaluated ESVs for 17 ecosystem service function types (Contanza et al 1997).…”

Managing biotic interactions for ecological intensification of agroecosystems

“…For example, abiotic variables and plant traits rather than land use alone were successfully used by Lavorel et al (2011) to refine the representation of multiple ecosystem properties and services in a subalpine grassland landscape. Independently, other studies also proposed using diversity indices (e.g., Simpson diversity index, Bateman et al, 2013) to quantify the value of biodiversity as a provider of cultural services. Taking account of the true complexity of food webs is one of the difficult challenges in filling the remaining gaps in the understanding of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and services.…”

Assessing wetland services for improved development decision-making: a case study of mangroves in coastal Bangladesh

“…Qualitative description of such biospheresupporting attributes not captured in traditional commodity markets is quite straightforward, but is often less persuasive in decision-making than more quantitative valuation Alongi 2002;Chee 2004;Curtis 2004). While translating the value of ecosystem services into more explicit monetary terms is increasingly advocated (Bateman et al 2013;Mukherjee et al 2014), it requires sufficient knowledge of stakeholder activities and preferences, the socio-economic context and local administrative structures to effectively support decision-making. It also, fundamentally, requires methodology that is able to measure and value not only the substantive provisioning goods that can be obtained from the environment, but also the importance of those supporting, regulating and cultural services that are less amenable to direct economic valuation.…”