2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0395-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright sub-20-nm cathodoluminescent nanoprobes for electron microscopy

Abstract: Electron microscopy (EM) has been instrumental in our understanding of complex biological systems. Although EM reveals cellular morphology with nanoscale resolution, it does not provide information on the location of different types of proteins. An EM-based bioimaging technology capable of localizing individual proteins and resolving protein-protein interactions with respect to cellular ultrastructure would provide important insights into the molecular biology of a cell. Here, we synthesized small lanthanide-d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the SE and CL images confirm the emission from the overall majority of particles, emission intensities vary for individual particles, in line with previous studies. [ 25,35 ] Slight discrepancies between SE and CL may also be attributed to charging [ 25 ] and carbon deposition [ 18 ] during the imaging process. Additionally, a weak background signal stemming from autofluorescence [ 25 ] was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the SE and CL images confirm the emission from the overall majority of particles, emission intensities vary for individual particles, in line with previous studies. [ 25,35 ] Slight discrepancies between SE and CL may also be attributed to charging [ 25 ] and carbon deposition [ 18 ] during the imaging process. Additionally, a weak background signal stemming from autofluorescence [ 25 ] was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25,35 ] Slight discrepancies between SE and CL may also be attributed to charging [ 25 ] and carbon deposition [ 18 ] during the imaging process. Additionally, a weak background signal stemming from autofluorescence [ 25 ] was observed. Again, nanoparticle clusters (containing between 2 and 6 nanoparticles) were observed, indicative of the well‐known receptor clustering and in line with the immunogold findings (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations