1967
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1967.00760040642010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Tone Audiometry: Results in Normal and Impaired Ears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies in the psychoacoustic literature have been concerned with the development of an effective diagnostic technique for assessing temporal integration functions in suspected or established hearing-impaired subjects (Harris, Haines, & Myers, 1958;Sanders & Honig, 1967;Woodford et al, 1975). Such a test would be particularly applicable to subjects with hearing deficits of cochlear etiology since these people are generally deficient in their capacity to integrate acoustic energy to normal threshold levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies in the psychoacoustic literature have been concerned with the development of an effective diagnostic technique for assessing temporal integration functions in suspected or established hearing-impaired subjects (Harris, Haines, & Myers, 1958;Sanders & Honig, 1967;Woodford et al, 1975). Such a test would be particularly applicable to subjects with hearing deficits of cochlear etiology since these people are generally deficient in their capacity to integrate acoustic energy to normal threshold levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High thresholds are a symptom of pathology but we are often unable to say what that pathology is; the same high threshold could imply different underlying causes. A possible basis for differentiation lies in "brief-tone audiometry" where multiple threshold measurements are made at different tone durations (Elliott, 1963;Sanders and Honig, 1967;Richards and Dunn, 1974;Wright, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of stimulus duration on psychophysical measures, such as detection threshold, has long been thought to reflect the existence of temporal integration or evidence accumulation; a process characterized by a variety of different models across sensory modalities (Gerken et al 1983;Huk & Shadlen, 2005;Viemeister & Wakefield, 1991;Watson, 1979). Within the auditory domain, the clinical utility of the relationship between duration and detection threshold has been well known for some time, in the form of short-tone audiometry (Chung and Smith, 1980;Chung, 1981;Chung, 1982;Sanders & Honig, 1967). This relationship between stimulus duration and perceptual measures has also been described experimentally when measuring reaction time (RT) as a function of stimulus duration (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%