1968
DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0302_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Report: Maxplane Meets Thurstone's "Factorially Invariant" Box Problem

Abstract: Using Maxplane, Thurstone's Box Problem is shown to be indeterminate. Slight modifications of the data matrix eventually allow an exactly perfect solution, however. It is suggested that obtained data matrices may often not be determinate with respect to simple structure, and that prolonged experimentation may be required before it is reasonable to expect such determinacy. I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a simple oblique factor structure a Maxplane rotation procedure (Cattell & Muerle, 1960; Eber, 1968) was conducted. Beginning with an orthogonal Varimax rotation using principal axis factoring extraction, a Maxplane rotation program was employed to maximize the number of loadings or projections in the hyperplanes so that a more simple structure was obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a simple oblique factor structure a Maxplane rotation procedure (Cattell & Muerle, 1960; Eber, 1968) was conducted. Beginning with an orthogonal Varimax rotation using principal axis factoring extraction, a Maxplane rotation program was employed to maximize the number of loadings or projections in the hyperplanes so that a more simple structure was obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that no Promax rotation based on a hypothesis matrix formed from any of these orthogonal factor matrices would lead to a correct solution. Eber [1968] showed that the Cattell-Eber maxplane method would not solve it either.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%