Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale--Iranian Version

Tavoli, Azadeh; Melyani, Mahdiyeh; Bakhtiari, Maryam; Ghaedi, Gholam Hossein; Montazeri, Ali

doi:10.1037/t12259-000

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The correlation of this scale with other scales of social interaction fear, avoidance of social situations, and other tools that assess social anxiety has been computed as moderate to high (Rodebaugh, Woods & Heimberg, 2007). In Iran, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability of this tool were reported to be 0.90 and 0.79, respectively (Tavoli et al, 2012). This scale was used to measure the severity of SAD symptoms.…”

Section: Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (Sias)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotional Dysregulation Symptoms Based on Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward and Intensity Mediated by Emotion Regulation

Aghajani

Izadi

Farrokhi

et al. 2021

PCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The emotion dysregulation model by Mennin and Fresco considers the high comorbidity of generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder and pays special attention to their comorbidity. Additionally, due to the high comorbidity of social anxiety disorder as well as anxiety and mood disorders, this disorder was considered along with the last two disorders. This study aimed to assess a Conceptual Model of Emotional Dysregulation Symptoms Based on Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward and Intensity of Positive and Negative Emotions Mediated by Emotion Regulation Strategies in Students. Methods: In total, 189 students affiliated with the Sharif University were selected by random sampling method. Then, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), the Affect Intensity Measure (AIM), the Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Attention Control Scale (ATTC), the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ), the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), and the Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire (RPA) were distributed among them to collect the necessary data. The obtained data were analyzed by LISREL using structural equation modeling. Results: Pearson correlation coefficient data indicated a significant relationship between motivation components, positive and negative emotion regulation strategies, and the symptoms of emotion dysregulation. The results showed that the conceptual model of the research fitted with the collected data; accordingly, the positive and negative strategies of emotion regulation mediated the relationship between motivation and the symptoms of emotion dysregulation. Conclusion: The present research results supported the main hypothesis of the study. Thus, positive and negative emotion regulation strategies mediated the relationship between sensitivity to punishment and reward and the intensity of positive and negative emotion with the symptoms of emotion dysregulation.

show abstract

Section: Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (Sias)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotional Dysregulation Symptoms Based on Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward and Intensity Mediated by Emotion Regulation

Aghajani

Izadi

Farrokhi

et al. 2021

PCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The correlation of this scale with other scales of social interaction fear, avoidance of social situations, and other tools that assess social anxiety has been moderate to high (Rodebaugh, Woods, & Heimberg, 2007). In Iran, the Cronbach alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability have been reported to be 0.90 and 0.79, respectively (Tavoli et al, 2012). This scale was used to measure the severity of social anxiety disorder symptoms.…”

Section: Study Toolsmentioning

confidence: 93%

Investigating the Relationships Between Reinforcement Sensitivity and Positive and Negative Emotion Dysregulation

Aghajani

Izadi

Farrokhi

et al. 2022

PCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity and positive emotion regulation strategies and negative emotion regulation strategies among students. Materials and methods: 189 students studying at one of Tehran Universities were selected by accessible random sampling method, and then Emotion Regulation Scale, Attention Control Scale, Experiences Questionnaire, Emotional Regulation Questionnaire, Positive Emotion Response Questionnaire, and Punishment Sensitivity Questionnaire and Reward sensitivity were distributed among them to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS-26 software using Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis. Results: Pearson correlation coefficient showed a significant relationship between punishment and reward sensitivity and positive and negative emotion regulation strategies. Multiple regression analysis showed that sensitivity to reward and punishment could well predict positive emotion regulation strategies. Multiple regression analysis results indicated that sensitivity to reward and punishment could also predict negative emotion regulation strategies. Conclusion: sensitivity to Punishment and sensitivity to reward were significant and common factors in emotion regulation. These results show that activation as a technique plays a significant role in the behavior that enhances the individual's search for reward. And suggesting that this approach can increase reward-seeking and thus improve emotional regulation.

show abstract

“…In Iran, this questionnaire was measured regarding psychometric characteristics in three groups suffering from social anxiety, other anxiety, and normal subjects. In a study by Tavoli et al (2012), the Cronbach alpha of the questionnaire was 0.88 with a reliability coefficient of 0.87. Also, Connor et al (2000) reported the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) at 0.77 and 0.82, respectively.…”

Section: Social Phobia Inventory (Spin)mentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Cognitive Distortions and Rumination in Adolescents With Social Anxiety Disorder

Ebrahimi,

Moheb,

Alivani Vafa

2024

PCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social anxiety disorder is a prevalent and persistent psychological disorder that is characterized by an intense fear of negative judgment from others, leading to avoidance of social interactions. This study compared the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in reducing social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms, including cognitive distortions, rumination, and anxiety sensitivity, in adolescents diagnosed with SAD. Methods:The study was semi-experimental, with a pre-test and post-test design featuring a control group. The research sample comprised 45 adolescents diagnosed with SAD, who were recruited from psychological service offices in Bukan City, Iran, between April 4 th , 2022, and September 6 th , 2022. Fifteen adolescents were assigned to the first experimental group, 15 to the second experimental group, and 15 to the control group. The subjects were selected using the purposive sampling method and were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. CBT (12 sessions) and ACT (8 sessions) were implemented in two sessions per week for the experimental groups. Each session lasted for an hour. The control group did not receive any intervention. The participants completed the social phobia inventory (SPIN) (2000), the ruminative response scale (RRS) (2003), and the dysfunctional attitude scale (DAS) (1978). The data of the research were analyzed using the analysis of variance test using SPSS software, version 23 and a significance level of 0.05. Results:The results of the analysis of variance showed that CBT and ACT have a significant effect on cognitive distortions and rumination in adolescents (P<0.001). Also, there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of CBT and ACT on cognitive distortions and rumination in adolescents (P>0.05). The Mean±SD difference before (54.76±13.88) and after (49.51±13.42) the rumination in the CBT group was significant (P<0.001). The Mean±SD difference before (98.32±7.44) and after (83.90±7.77) the cognitive distortions in the CBT group was significant (P<0.001). The Mean±SD difference before (52.33±14.78) and after (47.73±14.23) the rumination in the ACT group was significant (P<0.001). Also, the Mean±SD difference before (98.70±7.02) and after (85.13±6.83) the cognitive distortion in the ACT group was significant (P<0.001). Conclusion:Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that CBT and ACT can be considered in cognitive distortions and rumination in adolescents with SAD.

show abstract

Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale--Iranian Version

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Emotional Dysregulation Symptoms Based on Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward and Intensity Mediated by Emotion Regulation

Emotional Dysregulation Symptoms Based on Sensitivity to Punishment and Reward and Intensity Mediated by Emotion Regulation

Investigating the Relationships Between Reinforcement Sensitivity and Positive and Negative Emotion Dysregulation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Cognitive Distortions and Rumination in Adolescents With Social Anxiety Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About