2014
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-14-2649-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Communication: The interaction of clouds with surface latent heat flux variation before the 2011 <i>M</i> = 6.1 Russia earthquake

Abstract: Abstract.Recently, surface latent heat flux (SLHF) data have been widely used to study the anomalies before earthquakes. Most studies use the daily SLHF data. Here we use both the daily SLHF data and the high temporal resolution (four times one day) SLHF data, and compare the SLHF changes with satellite cloud images at the first time. We check the data from 1 September to 30 October 2011, and the result shows that there is really a very high SLHF anomaly (more than 2σ ) in the epicenter area just 5 days before… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genzano et al [2007] and Blackett et al [2011] specifically do mention the effect of clouds in the results of detection. Such effects should be considered, as in earthquake related literature [Qu et al, 2006, Jie andGuangmeng, 2014] pre-earthquake anomalies are reported to be linked with meteorological effects (temperature inversions, presence of clouds) rather than earthquakes.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genzano et al [2007] and Blackett et al [2011] specifically do mention the effect of clouds in the results of detection. Such effects should be considered, as in earthquake related literature [Qu et al, 2006, Jie andGuangmeng, 2014] pre-earthquake anomalies are reported to be linked with meteorological effects (temperature inversions, presence of clouds) rather than earthquakes.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our results, period affects anomaly density, even though this effect is present regardless of earthquake occurrence. A possible reason why time can affect anomaly density could be localized temporal variations of atmospheric parameters (as found, for example, by Jie and Guangmeng [2014]; Qu et al [2006]). Water vapour, in particular, influences LST retrievals [Freitas et al, 2010].…”
Section: Atmospheric and Other Environmental Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%