2019
DOI: 10.5194/tc-13-41-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief communication: Pancake ice floe size distribution during the winter expansion of the Antarctic marginal ice zone

Abstract: Abstract. The size distribution of pancake ice floes is calculated from images acquired during a voyage to the Antarctic marginal ice zone in the winter expansion season. Results show that 50 % of the sea ice area is made up of floes with diameters of 2.3–4 m. The floe size distribution shows two distinct slopes on either side of the 2.3–4 m range, neither of which conforms to a power law. Following a relevant recent study, it is conjectured that the growth of pancakes from frazil forms the distribution of sma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their absence has been used to infer consolidation of the pancakes into a compact ice cover (Doble & Wadhams, 2006). Our measurements of energetic waves (H S > 1.25 m) and intermittent internal sea ice deformations 100-200 km from the ice edge suggest that pancake ice conditions similar to the ones at deployment (Alberello, Onorato, Bennetts, et al, 2019) persisted for at least the first 7 days following deployment, beyond which ice conditions may have transformed as the ice edge advanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Their absence has been used to infer consolidation of the pancakes into a compact ice cover (Doble & Wadhams, 2006). Our measurements of energetic waves (H S > 1.25 m) and intermittent internal sea ice deformations 100-200 km from the ice edge suggest that pancake ice conditions similar to the ones at deployment (Alberello, Onorato, Bennetts, et al, 2019) persisted for at least the first 7 days following deployment, beyond which ice conditions may have transformed as the ice edge advanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The zero-S ice simulation apparently overestimates H s,3 even for very low C I cases (blue points in Fig. 4c), indicating some small-scale ice features (e.g., ice melt and drift; Smith et al 2018;Alberello et al 2020), which could affect the attenuation of waves dramatically (Sutherland et al 2018), was unresolved by the AMSR2 C I data and our constant h i assumption. For moderate C I (pink points), the full M2 model is in good agreement with observations ( Fig.…”
Section: A R/v Sikuliaq Cruise 2015mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The three sea ice models we select are intuitively appealing as a MIZ composed of numerous ice floes, pancake ice, and frazil present at different sizes (e.g., Alberello et al 2019) is mapped onto a modified dispersion relation with one/two rheological parameters only. These models, particularly the two VE ones, however, are practically difficult in the sense that estimating effective G and h for different ice covers requires tremendous efforts since these parameters could vary over several orders of magnitude (section S4; see also Cheng et al 2017).…”
Section: Limitations and Operational Forecastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To proceed and arrive at a concrete (although not general) realization of these functions, we will assume all floes are perfect circles. In assessments of the relationship between major and minor axes of individual floes, the "roundness" parameter for a floe is typically within 15% of one (Rothrock and Thorndike, 1984b;Toyota et al, 2011;Perovich and Jones, 2014;Gherardi and Lagomarsino, 2015;Alberello et al, 2019), suggesting that this circular assumption, while simplistic, is broadly appropriate. Nevertheless, it will likely be necessary to amend the analysis below in the future to account for more realistic shape distributions and geometries (e.g., diamonds (Wilchinsky and Feltham, 2006)), or to evaluate the sensitivity of the results that follow to the assumed shape distribution.…”
Section: Floe Chords and The Floe Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%