2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12119-015-9316-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the HIV Divide: Stigma, Stories and Serodiscordant Sexuality in the Biomedical Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in the introduction, such a framing may be part of an identity‐based struggle aimed at affirming the regularity and general unproblematic nature of serodiscordant relationships so that participants (and their relationships) might gain social recognition and legitimacy (Persson et al . 2016, Squire 2010). Given that participants often focussed on the shared project in managing HIV, this article, though including men in non‐monogamous relationships, focuses solely on HIV within the primary relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the introduction, such a framing may be part of an identity‐based struggle aimed at affirming the regularity and general unproblematic nature of serodiscordant relationships so that participants (and their relationships) might gain social recognition and legitimacy (Persson et al . 2016, Squire 2010). Given that participants often focussed on the shared project in managing HIV, this article, though including men in non‐monogamous relationships, focuses solely on HIV within the primary relationship.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most men were reluctant to assume a victim narrative, or frame PrEP in a negative light, noting that not only were they able to “manage” the negative issues associated with PrEP but that stigma rolled off their back so-to-speak. Our participants described how PrEP removed fear and stress related to contracting HIV, and told us that they saw PrEP as representing significant social progress for HIV-positive guys that helped to bridge the “sero-divide.” 29 , 30 However, we think it is important to reflect on the public health significance of some men on PrEP saying that they no longer discuss HIV status with sexual partners because of their PrEP use. While this reported change in behavior may be intended as a form of social progress—aimed at destigmatizing HIV positivity—there may also be potential unintended consequences of this behavior if more widespread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of people living with HIV to embrace the metanarrative of HIV normalization is challenged by the ignorance of wider society about the radical transformations in HIV biomedicine, making it difficult to be open about their HIV status. In doing so, it reduces “the ‘social problem’ of HIV to an individualized concern” (p. 509).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%