2020
DOI: 10.1177/0278364920943266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap between safety and real-time performance in receding-horizon trajectory design for mobile robots

Abstract: To operate with limited sensor horizons in unpredictable environments, autonomous robots use a receding-horizon strategy to plan trajectories, wherein they execute a short plan while creating the next plan. However, creating safe, dynamically feasible trajectories in real time is challenging, and planners must ensure persistent feasibility, meaning a new trajectory is always available before the previous one has finished executing. Existing approaches make a tradeoff between model complexity and planning speed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(161 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We fix ṗplan (t fin , •) = 0 so all plans end with a braking failsafe maneuver. If the robot fails to find a safe plan in a planning iteration, it can continue a previouslyfound safe plan, enabling persistent safety [12,Thm. 39].…”
Section: Robot and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We fix ṗplan (t fin , •) = 0 so all plans end with a braking failsafe maneuver. If the robot fails to find a safe plan in a planning iteration, it can continue a previouslyfound safe plan, enabling persistent safety [12,Thm. 39].…”
Section: Robot and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work develops a safety layer using a trajectory-parameterized reachable set, computed offline, over a continuous action space, to ensure safe learning online in real-time. This approach is motivated by Reachabilitybased Trajectory Design (RTD), a recent approch to safe robot motion planning, which uses an offline reachability computation and online receding horizon planning [12]. RTD uses a simplified, parameterized model to generate reference trajectories, or plans, and upper bounds the tracking error between the robot and planning model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for planning trajectories that are guaranteed to be trackable by the high-fidelity model. These works are extended in [18] and [19], allowing for limited sensing radii. Meanwhile, [20] leverages a similar idea to generate trajectories that incorporate system tracking error and will not have any at-fault collisions in unforeseen environments with limited sensing radius.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing controllers that meet such requirements in realtime may be computationally intractable, e.g., due to large system dimension or nonlinearities in a high-fidelity dynamical model of the system. The planner-tracker framework [30,9,28,15,27,29,25] addresses this challenge with a layered architecture where a lower-fidelity "planning" model is employed for online planning and a "tracking" controller, synthesized offline, keeps the tracking error between the high-fidelity ("tracking") model and the planning model within a bounded set. System safety is then guaranteed if the planner constraints, when augmented by the tracking error bound, lie within the safety constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%