2018
DOI: 10.1002/inst.12185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Gap Between Model‐based Systems Engineering Methodologies and Their Effective Practice – A Case Study on Nuclear Power Plants Systems Engineering

Abstract: This article presents a case study on applying model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies under real-life conditions. We present how engineers tailored existing MBSE methods and tools to both address the complexity factors of nuclear power plants engineering, and to contribute to the comprehensiveness of the design and safety assessment. We also provide feedback on the application of MBSE approaches and their key benefits on projects' execution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thales Group and Framatome presented a SE case study where model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies was applied under real-life conditions [6] . In that case, pressurized water reactors (PWR) were divided into nuclear island (NI) system (as their systemof-interest) and the conventional island (CI), and the NI system.…”
Section: Se Methods Adopted In Npp Design and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thales Group and Framatome presented a SE case study where model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies was applied under real-life conditions [6] . In that case, pressurized water reactors (PWR) were divided into nuclear island (NI) system (as their systemof-interest) and the conventional island (CI), and the NI system.…”
Section: Se Methods Adopted In Npp Design and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 SE applications span across diverse industry sectors, including: aerospace and avionics, [32][33][34][35][36] automotive engineering, [37][38][39] biochemical engineering, [40][41][42] civil engineering and transportation, 43,44 cybersecurity, 45,46 defense, [47][48][49] disaster management, [50][51][52] energy grids, [53][54][55] product manufacturing, [56][57][58] chemical engineering, [59][60][61][62][63] and nuclear engineering. 64,65 However, industries like aerospace, energy, and automotive integrate SE practices comparatively more than industries like consumer electronics, healthcare, and construction. 66…”
Section: Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arcadia describes the detailed reasoning necessary to understand the real customer need, define and share the product architecture among all engineering stakeholders, validate its design and justify it, early on, and ease a master integration, validation and verification [39].…”
Section: F Arcadia/capellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [39] Navas, Tannery, Bonnet and Voirin present a tailored version of Arcadia method that distinguishes between System Analysis and Logical Analysis.…”
Section: F Arcadia/capellamentioning
confidence: 99%