1993
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/31.7.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the Automation Gap Between Sample Preparation and Analysis: An Overview of SFE, GC, GC-MS, and HPLC Applied to Environmental Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that while this laboratory focused on the application of HPLC to the detection and measurement of PAH, other techniques, such as GC-MS, could also be applied to the extract (13,17,(19)(20)(21)(22). Gaseous emissions from cigarettes, such as HCHO, can also be analyzed by GC and HPLC (23).…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that while this laboratory focused on the application of HPLC to the detection and measurement of PAH, other techniques, such as GC-MS, could also be applied to the extract (13,17,(19)(20)(21)(22). Gaseous emissions from cigarettes, such as HCHO, can also be analyzed by GC and HPLC (23).…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies demonstrated that supercritical fluids (SF) provide a powerful alternative in sample preparation [3]. The main advantage of a supercritical fluid over an extracting liquid is that its properties can all be controlled by varying the applied pressure and temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to greater selectivity, rapid mass transfer, and higher flow-rates as compared with liquids. SFE also has considerable advantages over liquid extraction in terms of sample size, cost, volume of solvent, and analysis times [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the process of extraction by supercritical fluids has been known for some time [1], e.g., the selective removal of caffeine from coffee, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has only recently been applied on an analytical scale, analysts rediscovering the technique as a powerful sample preparation tool for off-line and online combination with chromatographic techniques [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The most important characteristics of SFE are the high recovery rates attainable with relatively short extraction times (typically 30 min) and the high degree of selectivity that can be introduced into the sample preparation step [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%