Brentwood Community Health Care Assessment

Goodman, Melody S.; Gonzalez, Maria; Gil, Sandra; Si, Xuemei; Pashoukos, Judith L.; Stafford, Jewel D.; Ford, Elsa; Pashoukos, Dennis A.

doi:10.1353/cpr.2014.0012

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 50 community members were selected to participate in the first cohort of this 15-week-long research training program that is based on the Community Alliance for Research Empowering Social Change training (Coats et al, 2015; Goodman, Dias, & Stafford, 2010; Goodman et al, 2014; Goodman, Si, Stafford, Obasohan, & Mchunguzi, 2012). The Institutional Review Board at Washington University School of Medicine designated CRFT research as nonhuman subjects research.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Community Engagement in Research: Quantitative Measure Development

Goodman¹,

Thompson

Arroyo³

et al. 2016

Journal Community Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the importance of community engagement in research has been previously established, there are few evidence-based approaches for measuring the level of community engagement in research projects. A quantitative community engagement measure was developed, aligned with 11 engagement principles (EPs) previously established in the literature. The measure has 96 Likert response items; 3–5 quality items and 3–5 quantity items measure each EP. Cronbach’s alpha is used to examine the internal consistency of items that measure a single EP. Every EP item group had a Cronbach’s alpha > .85, which indicates strong internal consistency for all question groups across both scales (quality and quantity). This information determines the level of community engagement, which can be correlated with other research outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Community Engagement in Research: Quantitative Measure Development

Goodman¹,

Thompson

Arroyo³

et al. 2016

Journal Community Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Goodman, Johnson Dias, & Stafford, 2010). The CARES training was tailored to be region specific and culturally competent for the strengths and challenges in the Long Island community; results indicated that the training was successful, useful, and impactful (Goodman et al, 2010; Goodman, Si, Stafford, Obasohan, & Mchunguzi, 2012; Goodman et al, 2014). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing Research Literacy

Coats

Stafford

Thompson

et al. 2014

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Community Research Fellows Training (CRFT) Program promotes the role of underserved populations in research by enhancing the capacity for community-based participatory research (CBPR). CRFT consists of 12 didactic training sessions and 3 experiential workshops intended to train community members in research methods and evidence-based public health. The training (a) promotes partnerships between community members and academic researchers, (b) enhances community knowledge of public health research, and (c) trains community members to become critical consumers of research. Fifty community members participated in training sessions taught by multidisciplinary faculty. Forty-five (90%) participants completed the program. Findings demonstrate that the training increased awareness of health disparities, research knowledge, and the capacity to use CBPR as a tool to address disparities.

show abstract

“…For instance, focus groups can be co-designed, co-facilitated, and collaboratively analyzed by community co-investigators (see for example, Johnson & Martínez Guzmán, 2013;McElfish et al, 2016). Other research partnerships have collaboratively developed and administered surveys as part of a community needs assessment (e.g., Goodman et al, 2014) or worked with community coresearchers to develop questions and conduct qualitative interviews (Watson & Marciano, 2015). The distinguishing feature of participatory research is stakeholder power in decision making and implementation; therefore, any research method or tool can be participatory if chosen and/or utilized collaboratively between academic and community partners.…”

Section: Participatory Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process

Vaughn

Jacquez

2020

Journal of Participatory Research Methods

283

173

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A process of social science research that combines inquiry with practical solutions of day-today problems of a particular group or community. Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) Represents a broad array of research approaches that emphasize academic-community partnerships focused on issues that affect the well-being of the community of focus. community engagement in research Ahmed & Palermo (2010); CTSA (2011); Key et al (2019) Community Science Research that is focused on building strong communities through partnered prevention, treatment, education, and health promotion efforts. Often used within community psychology.

show abstract

Brentwood Community Health Care Assessment

Cited by 4 publications

References 18 publications

Evaluating Community Engagement in Research: Quantitative Measure Development

Evaluating Community Engagement in Research: Quantitative Measure Development

Increasing Research Literacy

Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About