The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1063785011060277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bremsstrahlung radiation from high-energy electrons in wide gas-filled gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[39][40][41][42] It was supposed that the electrodes are plane-parallel in geometry, the electrode separation is 50 cm, and the voltage is 800 kV, so that the average electric field E av % 16 kV/cm. It was assumed that the air that fills up the discharge gap consists of nitrogen (78 wt.…”
Section: Results Of Numerical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[39][40][41][42] It was supposed that the electrodes are plane-parallel in geometry, the electrode separation is 50 cm, and the voltage is 800 kV, so that the average electric field E av % 16 kV/cm. It was assumed that the air that fills up the discharge gap consists of nitrogen (78 wt.…”
Section: Results Of Numerical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42] An x-ray flash occurred within about 280 ns from the beginning of the voltage pulse; the flash duration was a few nanoseconds. Its occurrence was associated with the evolution of both cathode-initiated and anode-initiated streamers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Laboratory investigations of REs in high pressure gas discharges are carried out both at microsecond rise times of the gap voltage [1,7,8] for E av < E br and at subnanosecond rise times (that is, in overvolted electrode gaps) [5,6,9] for E av >> E br . In the latter case, the mechanism of formation of the runaway electron beam is the subject of discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%