Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0760-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding Methods in Cross-Pollinated Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, genotype selection under spaced planting (i.e., in the absence of intraspecific competition), although frequently adopted in forage breeding (Poehlman and Sleeper, 1995;Posselt, 2010), was predicted to provide only about 60% of the forage yield gains provided by selection under dense planting (Annicchiarico, 2006b). This is caused by the only moderate genetic correlation for genotype yield responses across these conditions (Table 4; this agrees with phenotypic correlation values reported in other studies, e.g., Riday and Brummer, 2004).…”
Section: Alfalfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, genotype selection under spaced planting (i.e., in the absence of intraspecific competition), although frequently adopted in forage breeding (Poehlman and Sleeper, 1995;Posselt, 2010), was predicted to provide only about 60% of the forage yield gains provided by selection under dense planting (Annicchiarico, 2006b). This is caused by the only moderate genetic correlation for genotype yield responses across these conditions (Table 4; this agrees with phenotypic correlation values reported in other studies, e.g., Riday and Brummer, 2004).…”
Section: Alfalfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proved popular in perennial forage crops and amenity grasses over the last 100 and last 50 years, respectively (Posselt 2010). It has proved popular in perennial forage crops and amenity grasses over the last 100 and last 50 years, respectively (Posselt 2010).…”
Section: Perennial Forage Crops and Amenity Grassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, all breeders face the issue of the effectiveness of selecting individual plants grown at wide spacing compared with assessing potential cultivars under normal growing density; for example, spaced plants versus swards in grass breeding (Posselt 2010). Equally important for the success of a breeding programme is the choice of environment at every intermediate stage where families, inbred lines, hybrids or clones are assessed and selected, depending on the type of cultivar being sought.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sainfoin breeders have to contend with an allogamous (outbreeding) reproduction system, as is common in most forage species, and is often secured through self-incompatibility mechanisms (Humphreys, 2000;Posselt, 2010). Hence, under the absence of efficient methods to induce self-fertilization or perform controlled crosses between inbred individuals, varieties are classically bred as open pollinated varieties or synthetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, under the absence of efficient methods to induce self-fertilization or perform controlled crosses between inbred individuals, varieties are classically bred as open pollinated varieties or synthetics. Starting from selection of superior plants within a base population, this process of developing a new variety takes at least ten years (Posselt, 2010). The resultant varieties exhibit high levels of genetic diversity, evoking a generally broad environmental adaptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%