2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23285-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Breeding: Past, Present and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 488 publications
(682 reference statements)
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the genetic point of view, GCA measures additive gene effects, whereas SCA is the expression of non‐additive affects, either dominance or epistasis (Bradshaw, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the genetic point of view, GCA measures additive gene effects, whereas SCA is the expression of non‐additive affects, either dominance or epistasis (Bradshaw, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many crops, synthetics also serve as cultivars in agricultural production or as source populations for recurrent selection programs (cf. Bradshaw 2016). Synthetics are usually created by crossing a small number of parents (N P ) and subsequently cross-pollinating the F 1 individuals for one or several generations .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase will have to occur in all crops, but especially in those staple crops such as wheat, which provide about 20% of the daily caloric intake for a human being [3]. Thus, the demand for wheat is expected to increase by around 60% in the next few decades, but the potential yield is expected to decrease by 20% due to the climate change [4]. Added to this perspective is the fact that breeders have only achieved an increase in wheat yield of less than 1% per year while forecasts demand an increase of around 2% to meet the growing global food demand [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct methods are the most accurate and helpful for validating indirect measurements, but they are extremely time-consuming and prohibitively expensive when applied to large crop areas [20]. Moreover, their application in breeding programs would be of little use since they are often destructive and the sampled area within the small plots could be non-representative and lead to biased results [4,21]. Alternatively, in recent years, indirect methods based on bottom-up hemispherical photography, FPAR-inversion, spectral reflectance measurements and 3D point-clouds analysis have been developed [19,22,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%