2017
DOI: 10.1080/15240657.2017.1349504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Surgery as a Gender Technology: Analyzing Plastic Surgeons’ Discourses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision to go "flat" and opt out of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is not a common treatment option found in the medical literature; however, it is an option up to 40% of breast cancer survivors report choosing (Alderman et al 2003). Historically, research has claimed that engaging in reconstruction following mastectomy will optimize health and well-being (Coll-Planas et al 2017;Crompvoets 2012). Survivors have begun to utilize resources outside of their oncology team to seek out options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decision to go "flat" and opt out of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is not a common treatment option found in the medical literature; however, it is an option up to 40% of breast cancer survivors report choosing (Alderman et al 2003). Historically, research has claimed that engaging in reconstruction following mastectomy will optimize health and well-being (Coll-Planas et al 2017;Crompvoets 2012). Survivors have begun to utilize resources outside of their oncology team to seek out options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, this results in problematic assumptions about people's relationship to their bodies and to their gender identities (notably, one may not feel breasts are tied to or a fitting reflection of their gender identity). Additionally, there is a prevailing notion that reconstructed breasts are needed for psychological as well as physical healing (Coll-Planas et al 2017;Crompvoets 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the second half of the 19th century (during this period, the category of homosexual emerged to separate the socially accepted from the abnormal, deviant and dangerous [11]), the stigmatisation of sexual diversity was based on medical science whereby a homosexual person was considered to be sick [9], and any practices not for the purpose of procreation were considered sexual perversions [10]. During the Franco regime, homosexuality was viewed as a disease that was treated with electroshock therapy and repressed as a criminal act (under the Law of Vagrancy and later the Law of Social Danger), which led to many homosexual men being interned in re-education establishments for their reputed rehabilitation [12]. (For Gutiérrez Gallardo [13], the permissiveness towards female homosexuality in comparison to the repression of male homosexuality is rooted in the concept of the passive role of female sexuality centred on male pleasure and its procreative function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical professionals translate the mastectomized body into a series of surgical options in which the woman is absent and situated as something that needs to be 'fixed'. The discourse of a healthy body is presented in line with normative notions of femininity, and those who choose to remain flat are pathologized as incomplete and physically deformed (Coll-Planas, Cruells, & Alfama, 2017;La et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Breast Reconstruction Imperativementioning
confidence: 99%