2017
DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v51i1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast cancer screening in a resource poor country: Ultrasound versus mammography

Abstract: SUMMARYBackground: Breast cancer is the commonest female cancer in Nigeria. Despite its increased awareness, affordability of available screening tools is a bane. Mammography, the goal standard for screening is costly and not widely available in terms of infrastructure, technical/personnel capabilities. Ultrasound is accessible and affordable. Objectives: This study compared the use of ultrasound and mammography as breast cancer screening tools in women in South West Nigeria by characterizing and comparing the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As main complementary examination to mammography, US was much superior to mammography due to its attractive advantages including, but not limited to, high sensitivity especially in dense breasts, are unexposed to X-rays and are safe for young, pregnant, lactating population (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As main complementary examination to mammography, US was much superior to mammography due to its attractive advantages including, but not limited to, high sensitivity especially in dense breasts, are unexposed to X-rays and are safe for young, pregnant, lactating population (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where mammography is not available; ultrasound could be an alternative for young patients and patients with dense breasts. Some studies report an improved sensitivity of ultrasound compared to mammogram as the first-line screening in this population [40]. However, ultrasound has little to offer in mass screening because of its inability to detect microcalcifications and a high rate of false positive findings, so cannot replace the mammogram [20].…”
Section: High Burden Of Locally Advanced/advanced Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure is comparable to other low-income countries that have inadequate screening coverage. A similar study in Nigeria reported a figure of 2% of histopathology proven malignancy among the screening mammography cases [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%