Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysis

Abstract

IntroductionBreast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women, with an estimated 194,280 new cases diagnosed in the United States in 2009 alone. The primary aim of this work was to provide an in-depth evaluation of research yield in breast cancer from 1945 to 2008, using large-scale data analysis, the employment of bibliometric indicators of production and quality, and density-equalizing mapping.MethodsData were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) Science Citation Expanded database; this was searched using the Boolean operator, 'OR', with different terms related to breast cancer, including "breast cancer", "mammary ductal carcinoma" and "breast tumour". Data were then extracted from each file, transferred to Excel charts and visualised as diagrams. Mapping was performed as described by Groneberg-Kloft et al. in 2008.ResultsA total of 180,126 breast cancer-associated items were produced over the study period; these had been cited 4,136,224 times. The United States returned the greatest level of output (n = 77,101), followed by the UK (n = 18,357) and Germany (n = 12,529). International cooperation peaked in 2008, with 3,127 entries produced as a result; relationships between the United States and other countries formed the basis for the 10 most common forms of bilateral cooperation. Publications from nations with high levels of international cooperation were associated with greater average citation rates. A total of 4,096 journals published at least one item on breast cancer, although the top 50 most prolific titles together accounted for over 43% (77,517/180,126) of the total output.ConclusionsBreast cancer-associated research output continues to increase annually. In an era when bibliometric indicators are increasingly being employed in performance assessment, these findings should provide useful information for those tasked with improving that performance.

The h index and the identification of global benchmarks for breast cancer research output

“…Nowhere have these increases been as evident as in breast cancer research; one recent analysis demonstrated an average 15% increase in output annually since 1945, and a greater than 100% increase since the millennium alone [1]. Allied to the growth in output has been the development of the internet and the emergence of a ''publish or perish'' culture wherein researchers feel increasingly pressured to generate ''publishable'' results [2].…”

Pediatric burns research: A history or an evolution?

“…It has been used to create ''top cited articles'' in several specialties [2][3][4]. It has also been used in more novels ways to assess research output and funding [5,6], to identify research gaps within a specialty [7,8], with some grant authorities using this technique to decide on where funding should be distributed.…”

Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture

“…The volume of scientific literature in oncology increased rapidly during the last 50 years [14]. Systematic evaluation of research output is necessary to guide individual reading, to plan research activities according to shortcomings and to quantify individual and collaborative productivity on national and international level.…”