2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy and the Risk of Acute Coronary Events: Insights From a Process-Oriented Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may not be meaningful to reduce the cardiac exposure dose further by using deep inhalation breath-holding or IMRT. However, caution may be needed in patients with multiple risk factors for cardiac-related events (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may not be meaningful to reduce the cardiac exposure dose further by using deep inhalation breath-holding or IMRT. However, caution may be needed in patients with multiple risk factors for cardiac-related events (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, we found that only 7% of patients with zero baseline CAC had CAC progression >0 two years after RT (92% for patient with non-zero baseline CAC), which is quite consistent with Gopal et al’s results. Simonetto et al [ 28 ], based on a process-oriented model of acute coronary event, also illustrated the major contribution of baseline CAC or age in the risk of advanced atherosclerosis after RT, and mean heart dose remained associated with the acute coronary event risk only in cases of already existing calcified plaques. This raises the question of whether cardiac radiation exposure after RT would be involved in initiation or progression of atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cancer, integration of epidemiology and biology has long been discussed (246,247), and epidemiological data have been applied to several biologically based mechanistic models (248,249). The integrative approach would also indeed be needed for cataracts (250), DCS (247) and other noncancer effects, but such studies are very limited, e.g., for cataracts (251) and DCS (252)(253)(254)(255). To this end, developments of biologically based dose response (BBDR) models would be critical to enhance the risk assessment process (by reducing uncertainty in risk estimates at low dose and low dose rate), and developments of adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) would be required to determine BBDR model parameters (247).…”
Section: Integration Of Epidemiology and Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%