42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-2817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakup Simulation of Elliptical Liquid Jet in Gaseous Crossflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The penetration depth of the jet becomes lower due to more liquid mass loss derived from more droplet stripping. The result is consistent with the conclusion in subsonic flow in [43]. The penetration depth of the elliptical liquid jet (AR = 0:25) is 20% higher than the round liquid jet in Figure 9.…”
Section: Breakup Processes Of Elliptical Liquid Jet In Supersonicsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The penetration depth of the jet becomes lower due to more liquid mass loss derived from more droplet stripping. The result is consistent with the conclusion in subsonic flow in [43]. The penetration depth of the elliptical liquid jet (AR = 0:25) is 20% higher than the round liquid jet in Figure 9.…”
Section: Breakup Processes Of Elliptical Liquid Jet In Supersonicsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The spreading angle is defined in the upper right corner in Figure 10. Under the two-dimensional top view, the liquid drops from the center of the spray hole to the outermost edges of the left and right sides are straight lines, and the clamped angle is the spreading angle [43]. Figure 10 shows the spread angles at five different aspect ratios.…”
Section: Breakup Processes Of Elliptical Liquid Jet In Supersonicmentioning
confidence: 99%