2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not

Abstract: Conclusions: This study suggests that interrupting sitting time with frequent brief bouts of 37 light-intensity activity, but not standing, imparts beneficial postprandial responses that may 38 enhance cardiometabolic health. These findings may have importance in the design of 39 effective interventions to reduce cardiometabolic disease risk. 40

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
304
7
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
304
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…intensity and frequency of breaks and duration of prolonged sitting (1,9,16,17,30). Importantly, distinct from the majority of experimental studies which have interrupted sitting with short periods of activities (2), the current setup differentiates the independent effects of sitting and standing.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…intensity and frequency of breaks and duration of prolonged sitting (1,9,16,17,30). Importantly, distinct from the majority of experimental studies which have interrupted sitting with short periods of activities (2), the current setup differentiates the independent effects of sitting and standing.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, standing may benefit glucose tolerance through mechanisms linked to either increased carbohydrate or fat oxidation, but these mutually inhibitory mechanisms have not been quantified concurrently with muscle activity and metabolic markers during standing. Concurrent measurement of these potential mechanisms is required to explain why in some studies standing has not elicited metabolic benefits (1,23), and thus to elucidate whether standing is a healthy alternative to sitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bailey and Locke (2014) found that SB breaks every 20 min with 2 min of light intensity walking reduced postprandial plasma glucose concentration (iAUC 18.5 mmol l ). Therefore, physical activity interventions should aim to interrupt SB with a physical activity that is a movement-based LIPA.…”
Section: Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity: Impact On Glucosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is evident that frequent MVPA can protect against the effects of aging on glucose control (Yamanouchi et al 1992), it can be difficult for elderly populations to accumulate the recommended levels of MVPA. Therefore, future intervention studies, similar to the work of Peddie et al (2013), Healy et al (2008a), and Bailey and Locke (2014) should be conducted using aging populations, whose waking hours are predominantly spent performing SB (Harvey et al 2013), to examine the potential benefits of LIPA breaks.…”
Section: Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity: Impact On Glucosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies utilizing a similar intermittent walking approach throughout the day have also shown improvements in glucose control (Bailey & Locke, 2014;Dunstan et al, 2012;Francois et al, 2014;Peddie et al, 2013). Francois et al (2014) recently investigated the impact of small doses of high-intensity walking (exercise snacks) on blood glucose control in nine individuals with IFG.…”
Section: Walking and Postprandial Hyperglycemiamentioning
confidence: 99%