Breaking through boundaries with PAR – or not? A research project on the facilitation of participatory governance through participatory action research (PAR)

Abstract

In this paper, two researchers reflect on the institutional space for participatory governance in a participatory action research (PAR) process that was initiated by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (ECS) in the Netherlands. It was implemented in two schools by researchers contracted by the ministry. The project's aim was to explore possibilities for involving schools in policy processes using PAR. We conclude that PAR sheds light on the communication strategies, power and authority balances, and meaning of participation among the participants. The attempt to break through traditional hierarchies generated new insights into the institutional space at both the participating schools and the government institutions that can be used to create participatory approaches to governance. The researchers were the bridging actors between the schools and the government institutions. While previous research showed that a bridging actor can play a positive role as an objective party who is able to deliberate between the participants, we found that it impeded the creation of a participatory governance space.

Co-Creating Descriptors and a Definition for Person-Centred Coordinated Health Care: An Action Research Study

“…There is a recognition of fragmentation in health service delivery and the need to meet public expectations of effectiveness, efficiency within person centred approaches [ 1 ]. Participatory action research is a feature many countries’ policy development [ 50 ] and involves the participation of those whose lives or work are impacted by the study focus [ 48 ]. Although there were positive accounts of experiencing healthcare, many participants detailed challenges.…”

A collaborative approach to develop indigenous specific parenting education

“…This approach requires collaboration with community‐based organizations and partners to identify key issues by those who are affected (Doucet et al, 2022; Lennette, 2022). To collaborate successfully means having community members as equal partners, and not solely as participants, where there is shared power in implementation, knowledge production and decision‐making processes (Fahlberg, 2023; Peltier 2018; Visser & Kreemers, 2020).…”

Penulisan Sejarah Rekonsiliatif: Refleksi Pendampingan Penulisan Tambo Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

“…Hasil dari model survei KAP diyakini membantu dalam perencanaan pelaksanaan program dan sangat mempengaruhi proses pengambilan keputusan (Mohd Hashim, 2022). Survei KAP ini akan menggunakan tiga dimensi, yaitu Knowledge, Attitude, dan Practice (Wong & Ho, 2021), (Visser & Kreemers, 2020), (YAPPIKA-USAID, 2013), (Eilks & Markic, 2011), (Grundy, 1982) yang dikaitkan dengan tema nagari adat, yaitu, pengetahuan (knowledge) tentang aspek hukum positif dan hukum adat tentang nagari; penilaian dan penyikapan (attitude) masyarakat tentang ketentuan nagari adat; dan praktik atau pelaksanaan (practice) pelaksanaan tatakelola nagari dan pelaksanaan adat. Pada prinsipnya Survey KAP tidak dilaksanakan secara ketat, namun untuk pengkategorian masalah digunakan ketiga dimensi tersebut.…”