2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijart.2011.043447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

�Breaking the glass : preserving social history in virtual environments

Abstract: New media technologies play an important role in the evolution of our society. Traditional museums and heritage sites have evolved from the 'cabinets of curiosity' that focused mainly on the authority of the voice organising content, to the places that offer interactivity as a means to experience historical and cultural events of the past. They attempt to break down the division between visitors and historical artefacts, employing modern technologies that allow the audience to perceive a range of perspectives … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it segmented Head-Mounted Displays (HMD) to Augmented Reality (AR) HMD, Virtual Reality (VR) HMD, and Mixed Reality (MR) HMD. However, a selection of studies in the review did not state explicitly the fine-grained distinctions between technologies (Amitrano et al 2018 ; Kéfi and Pallud 2011 ; Kuflik et al 2015 ; Kuksa and Tuck 2011 ; Pallud and Monod 2010 ; Sylaiou et al 2010 ), thus, a classification was made according to a list of technologies classified by Ch’ng et al ( 2019 ) and Mohd Noor Shah and Ghazali ( 2018 ) which were based on the functionality of technologies. Drawing on this analytical framework, five types of technology were displayed in Table 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, it segmented Head-Mounted Displays (HMD) to Augmented Reality (AR) HMD, Virtual Reality (VR) HMD, and Mixed Reality (MR) HMD. However, a selection of studies in the review did not state explicitly the fine-grained distinctions between technologies (Amitrano et al 2018 ; Kéfi and Pallud 2011 ; Kuflik et al 2015 ; Kuksa and Tuck 2011 ; Pallud and Monod 2010 ; Sylaiou et al 2010 ), thus, a classification was made according to a list of technologies classified by Ch’ng et al ( 2019 ) and Mohd Noor Shah and Ghazali ( 2018 ) which were based on the functionality of technologies. Drawing on this analytical framework, five types of technology were displayed in Table 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;Kéfi and Pallud 2011;Kuflik et al 2015;Kuksa and Tuck 2011;Pallud and Monod 2010;Sylaiou et al 2010), thus, a classification was made according to a list of technologies classified by Ch'ng et al (2019) and Mohd Noor Shah and Ghazali (2018) which were based on the functionality of technologies. Drawing on this analytical framework, five types of technology were displayed in Table 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%