2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3147183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown current density of graphene nanoribbons

Abstract: Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) with widths down to 16 nm have been characterized for their currentcarrying capacity. It is found that GNRs exhibit an impressive breakdown current density, on the order of 10 8 A/cm 2 . The breakdown current density is found to have a reciprocal relationship to GNR resistivity and the data fit points to Joule heating as the likely mechanism of breakdown. The superior current-carrying capacity of GNRs will be valuable for their application in on-chip electrical interconnects. The th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
290
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
15
290
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For graphene-on-UNCD, we obtained J BR ≈5×10 8 A/cm 2 as the highest value, while the majority of devices broke at J BR ≈2×10 8 A/cm 2 . The reference graphene-on-SiO 2 /Si had J BR ≈10 8 A/cm 2 , which is consistent with literature [7][8][9]. The Graphene-on-Diamond: Carbon sp 2 -on-sp 3 Technology, UCR and ANL, Nano Letters (2012) 11 comparison with our own reference devices is more meaningful because they had similar graphene channel length, width, aspect ratio, quality and location of the metal pads, which serve as additional heat sinks.…”
Section: [Figure 2]supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For graphene-on-UNCD, we obtained J BR ≈5×10 8 A/cm 2 as the highest value, while the majority of devices broke at J BR ≈2×10 8 A/cm 2 . The reference graphene-on-SiO 2 /Si had J BR ≈10 8 A/cm 2 , which is consistent with literature [7][8][9]. The Graphene-on-Diamond: Carbon sp 2 -on-sp 3 Technology, UCR and ANL, Nano Letters (2012) 11 comparison with our own reference devices is more meaningful because they had similar graphene channel length, width, aspect ratio, quality and location of the metal pads, which serve as additional heat sinks.…”
Section: [Figure 2]supporting
confidence: 91%
“…We note here that FLG ribbons studied in Ref. [7] had the width of 22 nm and length of 0.75 m. For this reason, the close proximity of the source and drain metal contacts could have influenced the overall value of the breakdown current density.…”
Section: It Is Illustrative To Perform a Detailed Comparison Of J Br mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since its first characterization in 2004, 1 graphene has developed into a major research topic of its own and from the beginning, its unique electron transport properties [2][3][4][5][6][7] (For a review, see Ref. 8 ) have propelled the hope for application in a post-silicon generation of electronic devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the on/off current ratio (I on /I off ) is one of the critical issues to realize the graphene FETs. Although the contact properties are important in terms of an increase in I on , only a small number of experiments [1][2][3][4][5][6] have addressed this matter compared to the bandgap engineering for a decrease in I off . 7,8 In fact, an ohmic contact is obtained without any difficulty due to the lack of a bandgap, but it is concerned that a very small density of states (DOS) for graphene might suppress the current injection from the metal to graphene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%