The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13174449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown at Multiple Protrusions in SF6 and CO2

Abstract: The electric breakdown at single and multiple protrusions in SF6 and CO2 is investigated at 0.4 and 0.6 MPa, respectively. Additionally, the breakdown fields at rough surfaces of two different areas were determined. From the measurements, breakdown probability distributions for single protrusions were determined and fitted by Weibull distributions. This allowed the determination of statistical enlargement laws for the 50% breakdown probability fields E50. Such enlargement laws describe, for example, the scalin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since different protrusions come into play under different conditions, the presence of several microprotrusions acting in close proximity is unlikely. (Note that this reasoning does not apply to arrays of identical protrusions, nevertheless it is interesting to mention in this connection the recent experiments [41], which showed little effect of the number of protrusions in the array for the case of SF 6 but a more appreciable effect for the case CO 2 ; figures 7, 8 and 12, 13 of [41], respectively. This is an interesting point that may need to be revisited in the future.)…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since different protrusions come into play under different conditions, the presence of several microprotrusions acting in close proximity is unlikely. (Note that this reasoning does not apply to arrays of identical protrusions, nevertheless it is interesting to mention in this connection the recent experiments [41], which showed little effect of the number of protrusions in the array for the case of SF 6 but a more appreciable effect for the case CO 2 ; figures 7, 8 and 12, 13 of [41], respectively. This is an interesting point that may need to be revisited in the future.)…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 91%