Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions

Banerjee, Preeta M.; Cole, Benjamin M.

doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.001

Cited by 30 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with findings of Trajtenberg et al (1997) and Banerjee and Cole (2010), our results show that recombination distance is indeed positively linked with invention basicness. However, we also find that while private organizations are less likely to produce basic inventions, an increase in recombination distance by them increases invention basicness at a higher rate.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…On the subject of organizational capabilities, Banerjee and Cole (2010) show that firm entry into new application domains by a sample of biotechnology entrepreneurial firms has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between recombination distance and basicness. Is it then possible that the sector of activity from which an invention originates could also moderate the relationship between recombination distance and basicness?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Document publié chez l'éditeur commercialDocument issued by the commercial publisher Mention légale:Legal notice:In all cases accepted manuscripts should link to the formal publication via its DOI AbstractThis article explores whether the relationship between the breath of technological integration (recombination distance) and the breath of an invention's subsequent application (basicness) is moderated by the sector of activity (private or public), sciencelinkage strength and industry characteristics. Our analysis of Canadian nanotechnology patents granted between 1990 and 1997 shows that although private organizations generally yield smaller rates of basic inventions than public organizations, increases to recombination distance by the former increases invention basicness at a higher rate; increasing reliance upon basic science moderates the relationship between recombination distance and basicness; and increases to recombination distance in emerging sciencebased industries increases invention basicness at a higher rate. These findings have implications regarding the debate around the efficiency of the academic enterprise model. organizations, increases to recombination distance by the former increases invention basicness at a higher rate; increasing reliance upon basic science moderates the relationship between recombination distance and basicness; and increases to recombination distance in emerging science-based industries increases invention basicness at a higher rate. These findings have implications regarding the debate around the efficiency of the academic enterprise model.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This growth is partly due to the emergence of regional innovation systems, in which innovation is seen as a collective learning process which takes place essentially within the local environment (Coronado et al, 2008;Antonelli, 2009;Ozman, 2009). Such spillover effects generate more citations and have a greater influence on attitudes to innovation (Coronado et al, 2008;Banerjee & Cole, 2010). 13 The literature also supports the notion that geographic location has a significant effect on knowledge spillovers.…”

Section: Stream 3: Contextual Determinantsmentioning

confidence: 62%

“…10See, for example,Clausen et al (2013),Tomlinson (2010),Banerjee and Cole (2010), Mart ınez-Ros and Orfila-Sintes (2009),Coronado et al (2008),Blind et al (2006),Kannebley et al (2005),Beneito (2003),Galende and de la Fuente (2003), andStock et al (2002).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical Studies on Innovation Performance in the Manufacturing and Service Sectors Since 1995: A Systematic Review

Kolluru

Mukhopadhaya

2017

J of App Econs and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the literature on firm innovation performance from 1995 until 2016. The empirical literature on this topic has been growing continuously over the last few decades. Previous research has investigated the explanatory variables and their impact on firm innovativeness separately. The present systematic review brings together all explanatory variables explored in the literature, classified according to their direction of causality and impact on innovation. These are represented in a comprehensive framework that includes three major research streams: internal, external and contextual indicators, and examines how they influence the innovative capabilities of firms. In addition to this re-examination, the study shows that the majority of these variables are inter-linked with other variables in explaining the relationship with innovation, which is represented in a comprehensive theoretical model. The aim of this review is to draw a general picture of the standing of the research on innovation performance, specifically in areas where unanimous results have already been achieved, and to highlight the opportunities for future research.

show abstract

“…For example, Shi and Wu (2017), Martín-de Castro, Delgado-Verde, Navas-López, and Cruz-González (2013), Wu (2012) and Love, Roper, and Bryson (2011) measure the relationship between the age of firms and their innovative output. Stock, Greis, and Fischer (2002), Kannebley, Porto, and Pazello (2005), Blind, Edler, Frietsch, and Schmoch (2006), Coronado, Acosta, and Fernández (2008), Banerjee and Cole (2010), Tomlinson (2010), Clausen, Korneliussen, and Madsen (2013) and Qiao, Ju, and Fung (2014) consider the relationship between the size of a firm and its innovative productivity. Kang and Park (2012), Griffiths and Webster (2010) and Cefis and Marsili (2006) consider the impact of R&D expenditure on innovation, and Berger and Ofek (1995), Seru (2014) consider whether industrial diversification is a determinant of innovation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration and innovation: An empirical study of Indian technological enterprises

Heaton

Kolluru

Mukhopadhaya

2020

Econ of Transit and Inst Chang

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2010, the Indian government declared 2010–2020 to be the ‘Decade of Innovation’ and established the State Innovation Councils and Sectoral Innovation Councils to encourage and facilitate innovation by technological firms. In this paper, we study the relationship between collaboration and innovation in a cross‐section of Indian firms, paying particular attention to the impact of the innovation councils. Our results suggest that domestic collaborations have an important impact on firm innovation, as do the innovation councils, but that the impact of the councils is less for firms that collaborate.

show abstract

Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions

Cited by 30 publications

References 55 publications

Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada

Distant recombination and the creation of basic inventions: An analysis of the diffusion of public and private sector nanotechnology patents in Canada

Empirical Studies on Innovation Performance in the Manufacturing and Service Sectors Since 1995: A Systematic Review

Collaboration and innovation: An empirical study of Indian technological enterprises

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About