2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bread enriched with Chenopodium quinoa leaves powder – The procedures for assessing the fortification efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize the biologically active compounds in view of their GE and AE, the following factors were calculated (Gawlik‐Dziki et al., ). The relative phenolic bio‐accessibility index (PBC), which is an indication of potential bio‐accessibility of phenolic compounds, was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the biologically active compounds in view of their GE and AE, the following factors were calculated (Gawlik‐Dziki et al., ). The relative phenolic bio‐accessibility index (PBC), which is an indication of potential bio‐accessibility of phenolic compounds, was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Protein digestibility is usually high (ranging from 80% to 95%), but in some cases it may be affected by hydrolase inhibitors, decreasing the activities of amylases and proteases as well endogenous phenolics, which are able to modify the food matrix and inhibit digestive enzymes. 7,8 Most important, quinoa seeds do not contain gluten proteins; thus, they may be recommended for consumers with celiac disease or other digestive disorders such as gluten intolerance. 8 Quinoa's carbohydrate fraction includes mainly starch, containing a significant amount of resistant starch and dietary fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that strongly affects the obtained results is the extraction system. On the basis of the earlier proposed procedure for assessing the activity of newly designed food products (Gawlik‐Dziki, Dziki, Świeca, Sęczyk, et al, ), we tested three extraction methods—chemical (CE), buffer (BE), and simulated gastrointestinal digestion (DE). In general, CE is usually used for the estimation of antioxidant, but it does not mirror the extraction system existing in consumer organism and may lead to distortions of antioxidant potential of the tested samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following factors were determined for better understanding the relationships between biologically active compounds in light of their bioaccessibility, bioavailability, and bioefficiency (Gawlik‐Dziki, Dziki, Świeca, Sęczyk, et al, ): The extractability factor (EF), indicating the efficiency of antioxidants extraction (compared to chemical extraction): EFBE= ACE/ABE EFGE= ACE/ADE where A BE is EC 50 of raw extract (Buffer extract [ BE ]), A DE is EC 50 of the extract after simulated gastrointestinal digestion (digestion extract [ DE ]). The antioxidant bioaccessibility index (BAC), which is an indication of the bioaccessibility of antioxidative compounds: BAC = ABE/ADE where A BE is EC 50 of raw extract ( BE ), A DE is EC 50 of the extract after simulated gastrointestinal digestion ( DE ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%