Brazil: What Rise of What Power?

Abstract

From 2003, the Lula administration has started a discourse and a practice of Brazil as a major international player. However, the conversion of a giant economy and political activism into regional and global power status has eluded Brazil so far. Labels such as great power or leader do not fit it. This article suggests that the problem is not with Brazil being unable to tick all the boxes but with the definitions that we use. Hence a call for new mental categories that better capture the surge of Brazil and other emerging powers in the twenty-first century. Drawing from the business literature, Brazil can be better understood as an international manager. ). Over the next fourteen years Brazil has been broadly perceived as a decisive actor regionally, and a significant player globally. However, the conversion of a giant economy and political activism into actual, tangible regional and global power status seems to have eluded Brazil so far. So how can Brazil's emergence and rise in power be characterised? And how can their actual impact over regional neighbours be captured? As the opening piece of this special issue on 'Latin American responses to the rise of Brazil', this article has two objectives. First, it critically reviews the existing literature on the rise of Brazil and power-related labels in order to illustrate the key features, assets and limitations of Brazil's power display. Second, in doing so the article also sets the stage for, and provides some interpretative tools to read the subsequent individual country case studies.What rise of what power? is a question with important theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, and this is related to the first aim of this article, the question underpins general concerns in foreign policy analysis as well as more specifically Brazilian preoccupations. In the former case, it allows reflections on what a country wants in/from the international system and what are the best available strategies and instruments to achieve these goals. In the latter, it helps understand Brazil's dilemma on what to do to have its power capabilities noted internationally but at a relatively low cost. On the practical side, and this has more to do with the second aim of the article, the different possible answers to the question may generate different perceptions and therefore different responses from Brazil's regional and global partners. To understand what kind of capabilities, material and immaterial, a country possesses, and in what areas, political, economic, military, it can project them abroad is vital to assess relative positions and power, a key consideration in foreign policy choices.The concept of power and the ways to compare it -and necessarily to measure it somehow -are central to international relations as practice and as an academic

Explaining Brazil as a rising state, 2003‒2014: the role of policy diffusion as an international regulatory instrument

“… 7 We use the term rising states because it brings a broader interpretation to the political, economic, cultural, or social ascendancy of some countries, and is not limited to definitions based on traditional notions of power. Gardini clearly expresses this concern: ‘Traditional categories based on classic notions of power have demonstrated their limitations to capture the international status of countries, especially of those rising states whose behaviour is substantially different from the assertive and dominant posture of established great powers’ (Gardini 2016 : 13). …”

Emerging Powers and Peace Negotiations: The Experience of Brazil in the Nuclear Talks With Iran

“…Together with other second-tier states, they ambition to alter and fit-in the chessboard controlled by dominant world powers (Goetschel, 2011). Yet, emerging powers are not shield from their own vulnerabilities and weakness and that can damage international performance and make them volatile actors in the international scene (Gardini, 2016). The Lula government faced a securitized world in which the North-South divide reinforced with the view that threats were associated to vulnerable realities.…”

From Middle Powers to Entrepreneurial Powers in World Politics: Brazil’s Successes and Failures in International Crises

“…On the other hand, it is ideational and behavioral, describing a set of values, conduct, and political styles typical of those states placed in an intermediate position in the international system. In this sense, middle powers have been defined by their position in the global distribution of military and economic power as much as by their typical behavior (Sennes 2003;Black 1997;Carr 2014;Patience 2014;Cox 1996;Mares 1988;Spektor 2006;Chapnik 1999;Wood 1990;Pratt 1990;Cooper et al 1993;Cooper 1997;Cooper andFlemes 2013, 2015;Higgott and Cooper 1990;Keohane 1969;Jordaan 2003;Flemes 2007;Burges 2008Burges , 2013Burges , 2015Gardini 2016;Ravenhill 1998;Cotton and Ravenhill 2011;Lima and Hirst 2006;Macdonald and Paltiel 2016;Van der Westhuizen 1998Behringer 2012;Ungerer 2007;Nolte 2010;Ping 2005).…”